Answer:
Don't know too much about Law but I can say that M could sue under the common law theory of nuisance.
Explanation:
A nuisance occurs when an offending party acts in a way that interferes with another party's rights to use or enjoy their property. (Im only in 9th grade man I dont know too much but I hope this helps )
Answer:
The answer is yes. Some actions involve both criminal and civil matters. For example, assault can be both a civil matter and a criminal matter. ... For example, a person who has intentionally killed another can be charged in criminal court with homicide and can also be sued civilly for wrongful death.
Explanation: (true)
Answer:
A: Historical Law codes like Hammuribi's code
Explanation:
I took the test and got it right
Answer:
maybe
Explanation:
ome observers believe the crisis is due to the lack of economic opportunities, while others argue that it’s a result of foreign meddling and disproportionate military power. The reality, though, is that these are all consequences rather than the cause of Pakistan’s troubles. Taken as a whole, they underscore a deeper crisis within Pakistani society that goes right to the nation’s very foundations—a crisis of identity that originates in the late 19th century, when the idea of an independent Muslim nation in South Asia first emerged.
As Pakistan was founded in truly modern terms—inspired by the principles of self-determination that were prospering during the wave of independence movements in the post-World War II era—the best place to start understanding Pakistan isn’t actually one of these former colonies, but a future colonist: post-revolutionary France.
Not only does Pakistan’s post-independence trajectory bare an uncanny similarity to that of France’s First Republic, but the critiques of its path are similar to those of the French Revolution.
I’m almost positive it’s true only the southern states are republic
