In the early 1900's , a company often provided a company town, a place where the worker could live in the near working location ( usually like a mining location)
The workers usually were lured by the promise of high wage.
But here's the thing, in company town, a source of living usually can only obtained in a company store, and the cost is really high.
So instead of getting a high wage, the workers trapped in huge debt to the company, creating some sort of slavery that they have to work to pay off their debt to the company
Techincally, the company could easily bring those workers to the court ( even though is very cruel, they obtain the debt in a 'legal' way), so basically workers cant do a thing
The answer to your question is True. The supreme court can rule certain laws unconstitutional through cases.
Explanation:
it emphasizes the nativistic theory
a. this video is centered on innate development of languages. The children was tested by using the Wogs test. This test was simply a grammar test of word that these children were not used to. This video emphasizes the fact that children can easily grasp what they see their parents doing as well as the happenings around them.
b. This shows the symbolic function of languages. What the children learn is based on their level of exposure and the materials that are available to them. It also shows that children could have the same teaching but how they assimilate these teachings differs from one child to the other. Children are able to pick up on language and then develop it in their own unique way.
c. Merely being exposed to languages is not enough, But through encouragement to converse and , these children are more likely to be better in languages. This is due to the fact that children perceive languages in different ways. based on this i believe that parents should read to their children even before they start to talk. Given that initial sensory exposure has a big importance on how children develop languages.
