Answer:
I would say the answer is c
Explanation:
hope this helps and plz give me brainlist :)
Answer:
d or b is answer but i am confuse
The crime of False Pretenses is also known as Theft by False Pretenses or Larceny by False Pretenses. The crime of False Pretenses requires: a false representation. of a material fact (past or present) with the intent to defraud.
A crime at common law. The illegal taking of the property of another with intent to deprive the owner thereof.
The main difference between false pretenses and larceny is that a thief who secures title is guilty of false pretenses while someone who secures possession through fraud is guilty of larceny by trick.
Hope it helps you:)
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
