1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
makkiz [27]
3 years ago
11

Name a group that opposed the concept of Manifest Destiny? *

History
1 answer:
kotegsom [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

hope you like it

Explanation:

Manifest Destiny was the belief during the 1840s that American should stretch from the Atlantic to the Pacific ocean. ... It lead to the development of expansionists, those who supported to the idea of Manifest Destiny while whigs, stood firm against it.

Expansionists such as Roosevelt, former President Harrison, and Captain Mahan argued for creating an American empire. However, others, including Grover Cleveland, Andrew Carnegie, and Mark Twain, opposed these ideas. Manifest Destiny became a disputed philosophy.

You might be interested in
Why are personal freedoms limited in totalitarian state<br>​
AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

to instill terror and fear so citizens will follow government policies

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the early 1900s, the Bolsheviks of Russia worked to
koban [17]

Answer:

D. Bring about a new socialist government.

Explanation:

I'm not entirely sure I'm correct, but I hope this helps! Have a good night :)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 19 (1 point)
Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

  • Separation of powers refers to each branch of government having their own distinct powers, while checks and balances refers to the ability of each branch to prevent another branch from becoming too powerful.

Explanation"

The "separation of powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory.  The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu.  (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.")  He wrote an important work of political theory called <em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>, published in 1748.

Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall.  The framers of the United States Constitution embedded the separation of powers into the plan for US government.

As noted by <em>The History Channel, </em> "In addition to this separation of powers, the framers built a system of checks and balances designed to guard against tyranny by ensuring that no branch would grab too much power."  Some examples of the checks and balances used would be:

  • Congress (the Legislative Branch) controls the government's budget, so the Executive Branch needs Congress's support to fund any of its desired initiatives.
  • The President nominates federal officials, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.
  • The President has the ability to veto laws passed by Congress, requiring a two-thirds majority to override his veto.
  • The Supreme Court and other federal courts (the Judicial Branch of government) can rule that laws passed by Congress or executive orders by the President are unconstitutional, blocking their implementation.
5 0
4 years ago
What was the primary goal of the dawes act of 1887 regarding native america indians
wariber [46]

The primary goal of the Dawes Act of 1887 regarding Native American Indians was "(1) assimilating Native American Indians into mainstream American life," since this act allowed the president to divide Native lands into individual allotments on which Indians could live--after which time they would be granted US citizenship. 

6 0
3 years ago
how would you explain the gap between the rhetoric and reality in the idea of the american dream? Someone please help and give m
BlackZzzverrR [31]
The American Dream is it’s people , if you want to be practical about it then 1.rhetoric would entail the aspirations of the American people like the apple corporation, they started from a Dream in a garage and worked their way up to a full fledged world business 2.reality would entail something like how someone could make something from nothing so In essence they aren’t rhetoric or real they are more one and the same.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does most Indian literature have in common
    13·1 answer
  • The people of one country have decided they no longer wish to have individual state governments. They all basically have the sam
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the church hesitant to move from Latin to the vernacular (everyday language)?
    6·1 answer
  • For what achievement has the Athenian statesman Cleisthenes been credited?
    13·1 answer
  • How was industialization similar in the United States and Japan
    14·1 answer
  • The Great Depression can best be described as a time when ________________.
    5·1 answer
  • The U.S. Constitution creates a unitary system of government.<br> False<br> True
    8·1 answer
  • Those who see Jesus Christ as someone less than God reject _____.
    12·1 answer
  • How did Spain make money from its colonies
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT true about Ramses II? pls help!!!!!!!!
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!