<u>The party may be entitled to a </u><u>partial recovery</u><u> under the </u><u>contract.</u>
<u></u>
<h3><u>What is Substantial Performance in Contract Law?</u></h3>
Each party promises to uphold its end of the bargain when two parties enter into a contract. Say, for instance, that a property owner hires a contractor to work on their property's construction, such as adding a wing to the house. The property owner will pledge to pay for the services provided, and the contractor will promise to carry out the construction as specified in the contract.
When there is just a minor deviation from the terms of the agreement, a good faith attempt was made to achieve complete performance, and there was no major breach, a party may claim substantial performance. In essence, the result will be adequate to support payment for the services provided.
Learn more about substantial performance with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/15835417?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Studies of mutual fund performance indicate that mutual funds that outperformed the market in one time period usually do not beat the market in the next time period.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": a member of the human resources department staff.
Explanation:
The Department of Human Resources (<em>HR</em>) is responsible for <em>recruiting and selecting new staff</em> with the characteristics and profile which the organization is looking for. Also, the HR role is to provide the necessary sources to employees so that they can carry out their duties within the company in a proper environment.
Answer:
fetishi-zation
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this is an example of fetishi-zation of commodities. This is a term coined by Karl Marx's, which explains the relationship that individuals have, not among other people, but instead among things, such as commodities exchanged in market trade. Like the products that tourists buy at Mardi Gras.
**Word is seperated with a - because it is otherwise not allowed by the system**
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Here, shoes are normal goods as there is a positive relationship between the income level of the consumer and the quantity demanded for shoes. It can be seen that as the income of the consumer increases from $19,000 to $21,000 then as a result the quantity of pairs of shoes demanded increases from 9 to 11 pairs. Normal goods are generally have positive income elasticity of demand.
Therefore, the shoes are normal goods in this case.