No, it was not moral or right.
Instead of being submissive and acting as immigrants themselves, Europeans were destructive and killers. They had no respect of property. Andrew Jackson even forced them to move from their homes and most had to settle in Oklahoma.
(not all Europeans, but most)
<span>They were being positioned in the Coral Sea as part of a larger battle plan designed to occupy Tulagi in the Solomon Islands and Port Moresby in New Guinea. From there, Japanese aircraft could attack Australia.</span>
Answer:Zahir-ud-din Mohammad Babur
Explanation:
<em>1.) </em><em>Slavery </em><em>(The civil war was primarily to end slavery, but Lincoln wanted to keep the union together.)</em>
<em>2.) </em><em>Union </em><em>(Keeping the union together was important for Lincoln)</em>
<em>3.) </em><em>Support </em><em>(The north did not support slavery)</em>
<em>4.) </em><em>Border </em><em>(These states were with Lincoln but still owned slaves)</em>
<em>5.) </em><em>Fredrick Douglas</em><em> (Abolitionist)</em>
<em>6.) </em><em>Morally </em><em>(Slavery was morally wrong)</em>
<em>7.) </em><em>Antietam </em><em>(This battle gave the north more control of the war)</em>
<em>8.) </em><em>Free </em><em>(Slaves were not technically free quite yet)</em>
<em>9.) </em><em>Enslaved</em><em> (People were still enslaved in the south)</em>
<em>10.) </em><em>Laws</em><em> (The south did not follow the US constitution)</em>
<em>11.) </em><em>Government </em><em>(The north did not agree with the south)</em>
<em>12.) </em><em>Wrong </em><em>(Slavery was wrong to the people in the north)</em>
