Answer:
2^(5×3/5)=2³=8is your answer
Answer:
yup i guess
Step-by-step explanayuption:
The number of people who downloaded the app in the first quarter is 351,875 people.
Those who downloaded in the second quarter are <span>101,949 fewer people than those in first quarter.
This means that:
number of people who downloaded in 2nd quarter = number of people who downloaded in 1st quarter - 101,949
number of people in 2nd quarter = 351,875 - 101,949 = 249,926 people
Therefore, the total number of people who downloaded the app can be calculated as follows:
Total number = </span>351,875 + 249,926 = 601,801 people
Rounding this number to the nearest hundred thousands, we can get the estimated number of people who downloaded the app as 600,000 people
To solve an exponential equation, take the log of both sides, and solve for the variable. Example 1: Solve for x in the equation . Ln(80) is the exact answer and x=4.38202663467 is an approximate answer because we have rounded the value of Ln(80).. Check: Check your answer in the original equation.
Answer:
- Using conditional probabilities it can be shown that the results are influenced by the gender.
Explanation:
To prove that the results are influenced by <em>gender</em> you can calculate both the probability of preferring hot dogs and the conditional probability of preferring a hot dog given that is a female.
If the two results are different the probability of preferring hot dog is dependent on whether the person is a female or a male.
The probability of preferring hot dogs given that is a female is stated by the problem: 34.2%.
The probability of preferring hot dogs by the whole sample is:
- Number of males that prefer hot dogs: 184 (stated by the problem)
- Number of females that prefer hot dogs:
100% - 34.2% = 65.8%
65.8% of 635 = 0.658 × 635 = 417.83 ≈ 418
- Samples size: 542 males + 635 females = 1177
- Probability of preferring hot dogs =
number of students that preffer hot dogs / number of students =
(184 + 418) / 1177 = 602 / 1177 = 0.5115 ≈ 51.2%
Thus, the probability of preferring hot dogs given that the student is a female (34.2%) is different from the probability of preferring hot dog for the whole sample, making the results dependent of the gender.
