the answer to your question is false
Just rapple down and climb back up .
It would be considered a fact if there is a law against it.
Answer:
Waverly Place Jong was a poor Chinese girl
<em>She could see life is wonderful through little things</em>
She did not play with her toys anymore
<em>She was interested in playing chess</em>
She participated in different tournament
Specific detail one
<u><em>Having watched the older children opening their gifts, I already knew that the big gifts were not necessarily the nicest ones. One girl my age got a large coloring book of biblical characters, while a less greedy girl who selected a smaller box received a glass vial of lavender toilet water.</em></u>
Specific detail two
<u><em>I found out about all the whys later. I read the rules and looked up all the big words in a dictionary. I borrowed books from the Chinatown library. I studied each chess piece, trying to absorb the power each contained. I learned about opening moves and why it's important to control the center early on; the shortest distance between two points is straight down the middle. I learned about the middle game and why tactics between two adversaries are like clashing ideas; the one who plays better has the clearest plans for both attacking and getting out of traps. I learned why it is essential in the endgame to have foresight, a mathematical understanding of all possible moves, and patience; all weaknesses and advantages become evident to a strong adversary and are obscured to a tiring opponent. I discovered that for the whole game one must gather invisible strengths and see the endgame before the game begins.</em></u>
Explanation:
The two sentences choosen up there explain different changes that the girl had in the story and all those extract from the text help me to support both sentences
In both cases, it is considered plagiarism.
- when the post written for the client on the platform will be published on its own blog.
- when a post written for a client resell to another client.
<h3>What is Plagiarism?</h3>
Plagiarism refers to the act when any individual copied the content of another author or writer as presented as their own work without taking permission from them.
In both, the cases consent from the client has not been taken which shows the case of theft, as after giving content to the client it belongs to them only. So both the cases are considered plagiarism.
Learn more about Plagiarism, here:
brainly.com/question/27960172
#SPJ1
