Answer:
(C) Brown could seek an injunction against Watkins, on the basis of nuisance
Explanation:
The bugs and pests from Watkins grass clipping pile are a menace to his neighbour Brown.
Brown has tried extermination but the source of the problem, which is still there, makes his efforts futile.
Brown now has the right to seek an injunction - a court order controlling or restricting a person's behaviour - against Watkins on the basis of nuisance.
Watkins should comply
An experiment that could test the Premack differential probability rule is as per the following; the kids are given two reaction choices, one for playing pinball machine and another for eating confection and these practices are evaluated to figured out which is more plausible for every kid. A portion of the youngsters who discovered to favor one movement. In the second period of the trial, the testing of the youngsters was directed with one oF the two systems. In the primary strategy, eating was a fortifying reaction while playing pinball was the instrumental reaction implying that the youngsters played pinball keeping in mind the end goal to eat the confection.
Answer: $15,500
Explanation:
First we calculate the estimated Uncollecteble debt,
= 6% of 310,000
= 0.06 (310,000)
= $18,600
We will then subtract the existing $3,100 to find out how much we will send to the Bad Debt Expense account because the amount already in the account needs to be included in the $18,600.
= 18,600 - 3,100
= $15,500
We will therefore Debit the Bad Debt Expense account with $15,500 and Credit the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts with the same amount.
If you need any clarification do react or comment.
Answer:
the gourmet food that he was fed was poorly prepared
Explanation:
Shopkeeper's priviledge is the law that allows United States shop owners detain people that shoplifted from their shop.
They must have proof that the person did the crime and also are only able to hold him for a reasonable time.
In the given scenario the shop owner catches Ed red-handed in the act of shoplifting. He and an employee gently restrain Ed in the back room, feeding him gourmet food and wine until the local sheriff finally shows up three days later.
Ed can win a tort of false imprisonment if the gourmet food that he was fed was poorly prepared.
There must be proper care given while the suspect is being detained. Being fed poorly prepared food means he was detained under conditions that could be detrimental to his health
