A, B and D are already rational numbers, 0.4 itself is a rational number, two rational numbers make a product of rational number.
So A, B, D are the correct choices.
Are you sure it asks for rational numbers, not irrational number?
Based on this question, one thing that we would seriously consider would be the fact of first, doing
![2^4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2%5E4)
first. By doing this, it would then give us our answer as 16. By us understanding this point of view, we would then consider that this would then be your answer. That would then include that there would then be 16 pairs of the "enantiomeric pairs", and that would then be the possible estimate.
<span>a.2
b.4
c.8
d.16</span>
This question is solved applying the formula of the area of the rectangle, and finding it's width. To do this, we solve a quadratic equation, and we get that the cardboard has a width of 1.5 feet.
Area of a rectangle:
The area of rectangle of length l and width w is given by:
![A = wl](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%20%3D%20wl)
w(2w + 3) = 9
From this, we get that:
![l = 2w + 3, A = 9](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=l%20%3D%202w%20%2B%203%2C%20A%20%3D%209)
Solving a quadratic equation:
Given a second order polynomial expressed by the following equation:
.
This polynomial has roots
such that
, given by the following formulas:
In this question:
![w(2w+3) = 9](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=w%282w%2B3%29%20%3D%209)
![2w^2 + 3w - 9 = 0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2w%5E2%20%2B%203w%20-%209%20%3D%200)
Thus a quadratic equation with ![a = 2, b = 3, c = -9](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=a%20%3D%202%2C%20b%20%3D%203%2C%20c%20%3D%20-9)
Then
![\Delta = 3^2 - 4(2)(-9) = 81](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CDelta%20%3D%203%5E2%20-%204%282%29%28-9%29%20%3D%2081)
![w_{2} = \frac{-3 - \sqrt{81}}{2*2} = -3](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=w_%7B2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B-3%20-%20%5Csqrt%7B81%7D%7D%7B2%2A2%7D%20%3D%20-3)
Width is a positive measure, thus, the width of the cardboard is of 1.5 feet.
Another similar problem can be found at brainly.com/question/16995958
Answer:
Algebraic expressions are simplified by using given operators
like as arithmetic
But in algebraic expression there are terms