So, this question is basically asking us "If we had an x instead of a 2, would this be true?" We can try and see what we get:
So, if we want to show this we have to change the numerator or denominator in such a way that we can cancel some common factors. Notice that 
If we replace the factored numerator with the original one, we get:
Since we have an equality, this relation is proved.
Answer:
If the sphere has a radius of 4, you can use the equation: V=4/3(pi)(r)^3
Step-by-step explanation:
V=4/3(pi)(r)^3
V=4/3(pi)(4)^3
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Do you mean an isosceles triangle? If you do then the answer is yes because two of the angles cannot be more that 90o. If they are the sum of the angles are going to be more than 180.
For example, if both angles in the isosceles triangles are 100 then the two angles will add up to 100 + 100 = 200 degrees. No triangle has 200 degrees in it.
Well how about 90.? Could two angles in a triangle have 90 each?
No because 90 + 90 = 180. There's no room for another angle.
So two angles of an isosceles triangle must be acute.
If this is not what you mean, please leave a not.
