Answer:
True
Explanation:
yes it is true that you should ask the taxpayer if they had any other interest income to avoid double taxation elsewhere
Agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
The chief executive officers of the major U.S. steel makers would most likely be prosecuted under the antitrust laws if they agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
<h3>What are the objectives of antitrust law?</h3>
The Sherman Act, the nation's first antitrust statute, was enacted by Congress in 1890 as a "comprehensive charter of economic liberty designed to maintain open and unhindered competition as the rule of commerce." The antitrust laws generally prohibit unauthorized mergers and business practices, leaving it to the courts to determine which ones are prohibited based on the specific facts of each case.
From the era of horses and buggies to the modern digital era, courts have applied antitrust rules to evolving marketplaces. Nevertheless, for more than a century, the antitrust laws have had the same fundamental goal: to safeguard the competitive process for the benefit of consumers, by ensuring that there are strong incentives for businesses to operate effectively, keep prices low, and keep quality high.
<h3>The three core federal antitrust laws:</h3>
- Any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy, or combination to monopolize" is prohibited by the Sherman Act, as is "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade."
- The Sherman Act has harsh penalties that can be applied. The Sherman Act is a criminal law as well, and although the majority of enforcement actions are civil, anyone or any company that violates it may face legal action from the Department of Justice.
- "Unfair techniques of competition" and "unfair or deceptive activities or practices" are prohibited by the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Learn more about antitrust laws here:
brainly.com/question/8431756
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Old Price 27363
Exchange Rate 2.01
USD Value 55000
the company has committed to sale at $55000 existing price for next six months.
No currency hedge contract has been made by jaguar, in such case due to appreciation of pound the value of dollar will decrease but due to commitment by jaguar not to fluctuate the cost the total amount receivable in pounds will decrease as compared to 6 months before
USD Value 55000
Exchange Rate 2.15
Price in Pounds 25581
Decrease in pounds = 27363-25581 = 1782 loss
The net change in the Cash account balance from these three transactions is $30,000
What is the company's net change in cash account balance?
The net change in company's cash balance is the excess of its cash inflows from sources minus its cash outflows from all sources, in other words, the net change in cash balance from the three transactions is the funds raised long-term debt issuance and the amounts paid for equipment and raw materials
net change in cash balance=$200,000-$150,000-$20,000
net change in cash balance=$30,000
Find out more cash flow statement on:brainly.com/question/14942025
#SPJ1
Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
a. Bad debt expense A/c Dr $13,931
To Allowance for doubtful debts $13,931
(Being bad debt expense is recorded)
It is computed below:
= $421,300 × 4% - $2,921
= $13,931
b. a. Bad debt expense A/c Dr $17,722
To Allowance for doubtful debts $17,722
(Being bad debt expense is recorded)
It is computed below:
= $421,300 × 4% + $870
= $17,722
