Answer:
First one is the right answer
They were called "Border Ruffians"
relative deprivation theory
In the case of the French Revolution, it would also be good to note the role of relative deprivation in regard to the bourgeoisie, who were also instrumental in starting the Revolution. The bourgeoisie had been gaining wealth through trades and commerce, but were denied the same political status as the nobility. Nobles enjoyed tax exemptions and had political influence, while the bourgeoisie were still considered "commoners" of the 3rd Estate whose social rank was the same as peasants. They saw themselves as being as wealthy (some more so) than nobles, and as being equally as intelligent and valuable (if not more so) ... and so were spurred to revolution to gain the political advantages that they saw the nobility enjoying.
Internment camps were affirmed as legal.
<u>Explanation:</u>
President Franklin Roosevelt ordered an executive (9066) order to the US army to ban the American Citizens who have Japanese ancestry. More than 10,000 citizens were moved to the internment camps that were specially designed for the Japanese ancestry American citizens.
Against this order, Fred Korematsu who is an American with Japanese ancestry refused to move to the camp from his home. He was considered to be convicted for not obeying the president's order. After so many hearing in the district and high courts, finally, his case appealed in the supreme court in 1944.
A 6-3 out of 9 rulings by different judges on the court the majority held back his conviction. Also, they mentioned in the ruling that it is legal to cut down the civil rights immediately when is a racial group is considered to be the suspect.