To Kill a Mockingbird
<span>Main Character Thematic Conflict
Interpretation vs.Senses</span>
Scout is a highly sensitive child. Her ears and eyes are wide open but because of her age, Scout cannot render true meaning from all she observes. As she acquires more learning experiences, she becomes more adept at understanding what is really going on below her surface observations. For example, Atticus must correctly interpret for Scout the confusing incidents of her first day of school, yet much later on she is able to read Mr. Underwood’s editorial about the senseless killing of Tom Robinson and understand the meaning behind the words:
Then Mr. Underwood’s meaning became clear: Atticus had used every tool available to free men to save Tom Robinson, but in the secret courts of men’s hearts Atticus had no case. Tom was a dead man the minute Mayella Ewell opened her mouth and screamed. (Lee, 1960, p. 266)
In a film's story, the director's vision has to be accomplished by all of the staff. Is that your question?
First off, this isn't really a yes or no question, this is an opinion.
My opinion is that photos that have been altered in any way should be marked. These days you never know what a person will do to say, get a job, advance a political agenda, or ruin the reputation of another person. The public has the right to the truth. Therefore, altered pictures should be marked or labeled in a way that differentiates them from others.
