Answer:
In Lord of the Flies Golding illustrates that evil is present in everyone and everywhere. Humankind's work lies not in the impossible mission of eliminating it. But in the struggle to keep evil from becoming the dominant force in our lives.
The answer is Central
Hope this helps! If you are satisfied with my help, be sure to leave a nice comment on my bio! I would really appreciate it! Thanks!
Free education available to all citizens is one of the fundamental human rights anywhere in the world. This education must be of quality and provide the individual with the necessary knowledge to build their civic, social and professional life.
It is because of this right and the importance of having a quality education that we have seen so many protests and demonstrations by students, claiming for free and quality education in our fields.
According to the students, the education provided in the camps cannot be considered egalitarian and is not being offered to all citizens of the region. This is because the value of the annuity prevents people from being able to study, especially individuals with little economic power, who are the most in need of quality education. This infringes a fundamental and essential right for the region's development. Therefore, students claim free and efficient education, which brings about improvements in the region and is comprehensive and fair, since the population pays high taxes so that everyone has equal access to all educational resources.
Therefore, as contributing citizens to the State and recognizing our duties and rights within society, we must support the student cause and reinforce the importance of free education to which we are all entitled.
Hey there! :D
The form of a poem is the physical structure of the poem.
In, "Will There Really Be a Morning" the physical structure of the paragraph is more in small increments of stanzas. They use this pattern to create emphasis on certain words or phrases, and the rhyme scheme. Comparatively, "Ozymandias" is in one bulk, like a paragraph. The form creates meaning in both. In the first poem, they use the rhyme scheme to keep you interested and thinking about the meaning of the poem. Like in the first group of stanzas, it says, "Could I see it from the mountains, if I were as tall as they?" It makes me think about the readers perspective. Would he understand something better if he had a different perspective?
The second poem really likes to just jam a lot of words into your brain. Almost to the point where it is overwhelming, and I have to go back and slowly process what the poem is saying. "Half sunk a shattered visage lie, whose, frown..." It is very different from the first poem in that way. The first poem really makes things clear by separating the words and stanzas, with a regular rhyme scheme. The other poem makes it out as to almost be over the top, with many words and emotions thrown at you on purpose. It creates this distinct mood, almost as though it wants to be overpowering.
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
