Answer:
0.0918
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that the average amount of money spent on entertainment is normally distributed with mean=μ=95.25 and standard deviation=σ=27.32.
The mean and standard deviation of average spending of sample size 25 are
μxbar=μ=95.25
σxbar=σ/√n=27.32/√25=27.32/5=5.464.
So, the average spending of a sample of 25 randomly-selected professors is normally distributed with mean=μ=95.25 and standard deviation=σ=27.32.
The z-score associated with average spending $102.5
Z=[Xbar-μxbar]/σxbar
Z=[102.5-95.25]/5.464
Z=7.25/5.464
Z=1.3269=1.33
We have to find P(Xbar>102.5).
P(Xbar>102.5)=P(Z>1.33)
P(Xbar>102.5)=P(0<Z<∞)-P(0<Z<1.33)
P(Xbar>102.5)=0.5-0.4082
P(Xbar>102.5)=0.0918.
Thus, the probability that the average spending of a sample of 25 randomly-selected professors will exceed $102.5 is 0.0918.
The result of the log function 
is 60
According to the law of logarithm if 
then 
Given the following expressions
This can be expressed as
Substitute the value of m and n into the expression to have:
This shows that the result of the log function is 60
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/12049968
The answer is B 803.8cm^2
Answer:
1. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the population means (in other words, there is no treatment effect).
2. The<u> alternative hypothesis</u> is that at least one of the population means is different from another (in other words, there is an effect Of at least one Of the treatments).
Step-by-step explanation:
In a statistical analysis, the statistician shares his participants into several groups and administers treatments to them. After administering the treatment, he might want to compare the values obtained to see if there is a difference. If he accepts the null hypothesis as true, that means that there was no difference between the population means. This can also be taken to mean that the result had no difference among the groups.
But if the alternative hypothesis was true, that means that the population means were not all equal and so, there was an effect from the treatment administered.
Answer:
Hence proved △ABE∼△CBF.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given,
ABCD is a parallelogram.
BF ⊥ CD and
BE ⊥ AD
To Prove : △ABE∼△CBF
We have drawn the diagram for your reference.
Proof:
Since ABCD is a parallelogram,
So according to the property of parallelogram opposite angles are equal in measure.
⇒1
And given that BF ⊥ CD and BE ⊥ AD.
So we can say that;
⇒2
Now In △ABE and △CBF
∠A = ∠C (from 1)
∠E = ∠F (from 2)
So by A.A. similarity postulate;
△ABE∼△CBF
