The correct answer is B. He wants to address the same question that his audience is thinking about.
Churchill was a writer, army officer and British politician. He was a United Kingdom prime minister. He led to victory of wold war 11 in Britain during his time as a prime minister.
As a member of conservative party he ended his career in parliament where he was a prominent member.
In United Kingdom he played an important role as a liberal democracy defender which resulted from fascism spread.
He was a wartime leader who was victorious.
They are both planets lol
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
debtors were not allowed to own land in Georgia when they arrived
The conflict between Sumerians<span> and Elamites probably extended back to Neolithic ... The almost constant occurrence of war </span>among<span> the </span>city-states<span> of </span>Sumer<span> for two .... a situation that </span>led<span> to a relatively even development of weapons technology .</span>
Answer: Historiography for the Purpose of Nationalism.
Explanation:
The emergence of nationalism in a world dating back to the late eighteenth century. Get your full swing in the next two. Nationalism is reflected through all pores of political, social and scientific life. The emergence of nationalism also reflected on historiography.
Many historians have been encouraged by nationalism. Many of these works have emerged as a result of these tendencies. It is often a syndrome of lesser value because myths characterize most of these historical works. Their scientific value is also called into question. The historian must be objective when writing. The question is, where does this phenomenon come from? Nationalism in historiography seeks to portray, one national entity as larger than another. That is, to minorize another. A patriot historian can be objective, unlike a nationalist.
