Answer:
In that case...
Explanation:
here are several types of political ads. In a citizen ( 1.) Testimonial, 2.) endorsement, 3.) introduction) a regular person explains why he or she supports the candidate. In a(n) (1.) Testimonial, 2.) endorsement, 3.) introduction), another politician or celebrity explains why the candidate has gained his or her support. A(n) (1.) Testimonial, 2.) endorsement, 3.) introduction) ad describes the candidate's background and why he or she is running for office. This is similar to a ad, which explains why the candidate is the best person for the office. A (1.) Testimonial, 2.) endorsement, 3.) introduction) ad focuses on the shortcomings of the candidate's opponent.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the United States, two primary sources of law govern contracts:
i. the common law
ii. the Uniform Commercial Code.
The common law governs all contracts except when it has been modified or replaced by statutory law such as the Uniform Commercial Code or administrative agency regulations.
Contracts relating services, real estate, insurance, businesses are all governed by the common law.
Answer:
The separated and balanced the powers among the different branches. Gave each branch a way to check the use of power by the other branches to protect the rights and welfare of people. Each branch is given an equal amount of power to balance the responsibilities. Checking powers gives each branch a way to stop the other branch from making final decisions or from taking certain actions.
Explanation:
Hello, i think the answer your looking for would be a deposition.
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.
In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.
So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.
