The answer is going to be a. hope that helped
The argument that uses a non sequitur fallacy is C, "Regulations on motorists should be lifted because factories are a bigger source of pollution"
Explanation: Non sequitur fallacy is when the conclusion doesn't follow the premises. That said in different words, the premises is an irrelevant reason to support the conclusion.
So, as true as it is that factories are a bigger source of pollution, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that regulations on motorists should be lifted, does not necessarily mean that the reason to do that is that factories are a bigger source of pollution.
Comedies are meant to be humorous while tragedies usually are sad
Answer:
The Chinese concept "mandate of heaven" was sometimes used to justify the overthrow that was done of the Shang and the rule that was subsequent. Good luck!
Explanation:
QUESTION 6; c. television offers good and bad programming for families
QUESTION 7; b. it is ineffective support because it does not help prove the claim.
QUESTION 8; a. examples of situations when organ donations have saved lives
QUESTION 9; b. it is ineffective support because it does not help prove the claim.
QUESTION 10; b. the driving age should be raised for three clear reasons.
