Answer:
(B) Advice the production and purchasing department to produce or order smaller quantities of products.
Explanation:
According to my research on basic economics and business owning I can say that the best thing for Georgia to do in this situation in order to help her company become more value driven is to Advice the production and purchasing department to produce or order smaller quantities of products. This is because since product is not selling fast enough they should sell what they already have before producing more, otherwise they will be wasting money on products which will eventually cause them to be overflowing stock. Thus losing money.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
A unique individual is the answer (if this is right can you please mark as brainliest, thanks)
Answer:
$20,000 ordinary gain
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Cash proceeds from Selling of the equipment = $50,000
Purchasing cost of the equipment = $60,000
Depreciation expense = $30,000
Now,
The book value of the equipment
= Purchasing cost of the equipment - Depreciation expense
= $60,000 - $30,000
= $30,000
Since,
the amount of proceeds from sales is higher than the book value of the equipment
Therefore a gain will be recognized
The amount of Gain = proceeds from Selling - book value
= $50,000 - $30,000
= $20,000
Hence,
$20,000 ordinary gain
Answer: b) Supply is inelastic and demand is inelastic.
Explanation: Dead-weight loss is the loss in total surplus when a tax is imposed on a good which restricts demand and supply from balancing. When both the demand and the supply curves are inelastic, the effect of a tax will be lead to a small change in the quantity being traded in the market. Thus, the equilibrium quantity at the taxed price will not fall much and the dead weight loss will therefore, be smaller.
Answer:
Firstly in a long arm resolution, it requires the damage to be occurred inside the state, in the event of individual damage activities.
In the event that the defendant’s executes any business inside the state or agreements anyplace to supply products and enterprises inside the state than the cases emerging from this are amiable to jurisdiction and test for exchange is subjective. Along these lines an agreement of guaranteeing any individual, property inside the state has the option to present locale.
So here, Florida had individual locale over the defendant where the defendant had marked the long haul contract with the offended party. So the Florida law would apply right now, the court discovered there was sufficient to build up close to home locale in Florida as observed by the defendant’s educated and deliberate contacts with Florida partnership.