Answer:
Correct answer is The states are too strong and the federal (national) government is too weak.
Explanation:
First option is correct as governmental bodies, namely Congress first of all didn't have authority to impose certain regulations to the states.
Second option is not correct as states were practically functioning on their own, without having to respond to Congress.
Third option is not correct as after the treaty of Paris Britain had no influence in the United States.
Answer: Enlightenment Dream
Explanation: The the 1700s to the 1800s marked the period of Enlightenment and philosophers of the time such as Kant believed that one of the important conditions in achieving enlightenment is freedom. He also assumed that the people oppressing the weak in society will not want to give up their power.
Another thinker of the era of Enlightenment, Socrates believed in using public arguments to fight for what is right, in such a way that the powerful have no choice but to listen to the ruled
Dr. Martin King fought for freedom through arguments, without the use of violence. This is what this paragraph means by calling him an heir to the Enlightenment dream. He used methods thinkers of the Enlightenment Era believed would work in such a situation.
I think the approach used by constructivist in terms of global change centers on the states exist which shaped by social interaction and created by the identities and the interest of the people living in it. The global attributes of global change are:
(1) states are the key unit in order to understand the international political theory.
(2) the state is created is considered social and created. It is not considered as material being.
(3) it's interest and identity helps shape the social structure as well as the system inside it.
Old Norse religion in long term perspectives
Answer:
A. character vs. another character
Explanation:
The conflict that occurs between an accused person and a tiger can best be described as character vs. another character. That is because in literature, character vs. character refers to a conflict in which two characters struggle against each other in either a physical altercation or figuratively. A character in this context can be either human, animal or other species.
