Answer:
B. It is a common form of economic thinking
Explanation:
Thinking at the margin is a pattern of thinking where the thinker thinks forward with regard to the coming hour, the coming day, or coming income, while letting the past to go and considering what is presently best for the the thinker or in the coming times.
Thinking at the margin involves thinking ahead, and in economics principle, thinking at the margin is required for making rational decisions
An example of thinking at the margin is deciding to by more pasta for the month than required when there is a scarcity of a brand of pasta and the inflation, which may both be due to the introduction of better brand of pasta by the manufacturer causing a delay, and a temporary inflation respectively
Therefore, thinking at the margin is a common form of economic thinking
Answer:
The sociological significance is that the classification into dominant and minority groups allows the sociology to have an insight into the power relations that configurate the particular society he or she is studying. Besides, it is well known in sociology that aspects like class, power, and the economy are some of the most important to understand any society from an academic point of view.
Answer:
The collision occurs at a height of 1/3 of the total height of cliff.
Explanation:
The situation is represented in the attached figure:
For the stone dropped from top of cliff we have
Initial velocity of drop= 0 m/s.
Now the time at which it attains a velocity of 2v is obtained from first equation of kinematics as
Thus the distance it covers in this time can be calculated using third equation of kinematics as
For the stone thrown upwards the velocity at collision is give as 'v' thus the velocity at which it is thrown upwards can be calculated by first equation of kinematics as
The height over which it changes it's velocity from '3v' to 'v' can be again obtained from third equation of kinematics as
Thus the collision occurs at at a fraction of 1/3 of height.
The answer is: As close to the antecedent as possible<span>
</span>
Answer:
Articles 1, 2, and 3 of the Constitution describe the different branches of government, but there is no real quote about the separation of powers as a concept or doctrine.
Explanation:
There isn't really just one quote in the US Constitution that reflects the whole notion of the separation of powers between the three branches as the first three articles of the constitution each establish the importance of the separate branches and their relation to each other. The concept of separation of powers is thus inherent in the structure of government itself, but it is not really singled out as a concept or mentioned in and of itself. The legislative, executive, and judiciary levels are described in the First Article, in the Second Article, and in the Third Article. The concept of separation of powers is attributed to Montesquieu and James Madison wanted to include an explicit statement on the separation of powers in the Bill of Rights, but it was rejected in the revisions and suggestions made by the other Framers. It therefore remains an idea that is implicit in the government structures described in the Constitution.
