1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
max2010maxim [7]
3 years ago
6

How many members of the supreme court did Nixon get to appoint

History
2 answers:
Crazy boy [7]3 years ago
6 0
I think 4…………………………..
densk [106]3 years ago
5 0
He appointed 3 members
You might be interested in
Help please I don’t get it
Anestetic [448]
It would be the last answer. Adopted white American culture as there own
7 0
3 years ago
How did the use of aircrafts affect combat in world war 1
spin [16.1K]
Airplanes were vital for ww1 to ease transport of amo and soon guns on the planes including bombs this made it easier for to launch quick air strikes on places like bases vulnerable to air strikes
5 0
3 years ago
Time period when the Space Race occurred?
omeli [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

1955 – 1975

8 0
3 years ago
At whose imperial court did the Venetian trader Marco Polo spend many years as a government official? A. Huizong B. Charlemagne
vazorg [7]
Kublai Khan is the answer
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Formulate an opinion as to whether or not it was necessary to use such weapons.
goldfiish [28.3K]
I'm going to assume your question is about the use of atomic bombs against Japan at the conclusion of World War II.  If so, here are some things to consider as you formulate your opinion:


The United States saw the use of the atomic bombs as a way to bring the war to an end in a way that would cost less American lives.  A land invasion of Japan would have meant many American soldiers being killed in battle.  However, the cost in Japanese lives was enormous by the use of the bombs, and that was not given equal consideration.

Another consideration was that the United States had been engaging in a fire-bombing campaign of Japanese cities prior to the use of atomic bombs. The fire-bombing campaigns were horrifically destructive also, but did not have the radiation after-effects of atomic bombings.

An option that could have been used rather than dropping atomic bombs was to enlist Soviet troops in a joint invasion of Japan.  But the USA wanted to avoid postwar Soviet presence in Japan, and the atomic bombs were seen as a way of ending the war quickly.  You can consider whether it would have been a more "moral" way of pursuing war to conduct a land invasion with Soviet assistance.

Finally, the escalation to the point of using atomic bombs was, in part, due to the Allies' insistence on an "unconditional surrender" by Japan.  A second bomb was dropped at Nagasaki after the first was dropped on Hiroshima, because Japan did not submit to unconditional surrender in the immediate aftermath of the Hiroshima bombing.  You can consider for yourself whether some other resolution besides "unconditional surrender" was a viable option for ending the war with Japan.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Southerners react to slave revolts?
    9·2 answers
  • why is it important for pop-culture representations of history, like musicals or movies, to have historical integrity?
    6·1 answer
  • Why were west African empires prosperous
    14·1 answer
  • Jeffersonian Democracy and Jacksonian Democracy most differed in
    13·1 answer
  • What economic policies does Coolidge advocate
    13·1 answer
  • Which side (Union or Confederacy) do you think sang “The Bonnie Blue Flag”? Why?
    9·2 answers
  • Como hubiésemos comunicarnos en cuarentena si no hubiese existido el Internet
    7·2 answers
  • The importance of the Soviet expansion in Eastern Europe for the development of the Cold War
    12·1 answer
  • Who did America fight in the War of Independence?
    8·1 answer
  • 4. What is the 2nd most famous filming point in the world?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!