1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
choli [55]
3 years ago
12

30 points!! Either write a paragraph(relating to the questions) or just answer the questions.)

English
2 answers:
Bond [772]3 years ago
7 0
The government should be concerned about rapid population growth because it could lead to things like, food shortage, unemployment numbers increasing, the homeless numbers increasing, even an increase in disease

The government should help the citizens start their lives as in providing basic education through taxes and helping those who have hit hard times and need a little assistance, however with a bigger population and an increasing one as well the money supply to do such things is going to wear thin and make taxes go up or they stop doing such services

With too big of a population our carbon footprint could break down the O zone layer rapidly and cause the suns rays to be able to reach us and possibly cause cancer, we take up more room meaning less room for nature and we eat more so less animals and could cause extinction of certain animals climate will continue to increase
The government can put in rules about how much land can be used or how it is used keep companies from tearing down forests and make them government nations parks to reserve nature, get the people using more renewable resources instead of nonrenewable

The government should not be in citizens family related issues as in how many children they should have, when they should have them... etc however I do believe that before having children parents should be educated about the pregnancy process all that is to come ...etc BUT this all could be done through a DOCTOR who is the parents physician and not by government
Maru [420]3 years ago
6 0
The person above me has a good answer hope you pass this assignment u got this
You might be interested in
PIU<br>.<br>Which definition of economics is the most acceptable and why? Explain.<br>the​
7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

According Lionel Robbins which gave most acceptable definition as Economics can be regarded as science that studies human behaviour which gives relationship that exist between ends and scarce that means which have alternative uses.

Some of the key words that made it acceptable are ;

✓ Unlimited wants: the wants of human are unlimited, cannot be satisfied completely

✓Alternative use of resource:

✓ Limited means: there are limited human wants , though resources needed to get them satisfied are limited

✓Economising resources:

6 0
3 years ago
An explanation of events may be found in _____.
GaryK [48]
NEWSPAPERS JOURNALS DIAIRES
7 0
4 years ago
Why does the narrator compare the dirty pair of socks to a "sad little salted<br>slug"?​
PIT_PIT [208]

<u>Reason for comparing the dirty pair of socks to a "sad little salted </u>

<u>slug":</u>

A slug is a small but slimy creature that gets dehydrated when enough salt is poured upon it. It loses water, shrivels up looking dirty and eventually dies.  Apparently, a salted slug is not a happy creature as it is sure to die as soon as it loses all its water. Thus, it is a ‘sad little salted slug’.

The narrator in the three minute fiction ‘Not That I Care’ describes one of the pair of socks left by a character Marcus making use of simile, a literary device of comparison. The comparison is made between common characteristics of the two things compared.

Out of the two socks forming one pair, one lies in front, easily visible, dirty and all curled up while the other one is hiding under the bed.

The comparison implies that it was mucky and repelling like a salted slug.  It was lying unattended like a salted slug devoid of vitality. Simply thrown away carelessly in the house, it seemed sad too. The narrator had no intention of touching it, so the chances of its revival were bleak.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 1 of 20
KatRina [158]

Answer:

An online academic article written in March 2015

3 0
3 years ago
Which of these is a compound sentence? (pls leave an explanation if possible)
aev [14]

Answer:

B. Dos Palos was is a small community, but the land was good for farming.

Explanation:

This is because it contains a conjunction, "but" which strings two sentences together.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which sentence in the passage contains an allusion? Jay never felt so scared in his life. He cursed himself for joining the amat
    11·2 answers
  • On what is the woman "dependent"?
    15·1 answer
  • What Fear Can Teach Us commonlit answers ?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of look deeper into nature and then you will understand everything better?
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST.
    13·1 answer
  • Write an argument essay about should people in life or death situation to be accountable for their actions
    11·1 answer
  • Is this following sentence correct or not ?
    13·1 answer
  • Should kids be banned from junk food?
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP <br><br>Does Monday come after or before Wednesday​
    12·1 answer
  • What is the most important paragraph/part of the passage "An Occurrence at Owl Creek"?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!