I think the answer is anarchy
The law of suspects was passed on 17 September 1793, that was authorized to create the revolutionary tribunals to arrests the enemies of the people and country.
<h3>Who founded the law of suspects? What was the main purpose of the law of suspect?</h3>
Law of suspects is the legal order that was introduced by the Robespierre in 1793.
The main purpose of the law of suspect was to protect the revolution from its enemies. It empowered the revolutionary tribunals to arrest those, who have show themselves as the promoter of the tyranny and enemies of the liberty.
Basically, it takes the harsh actions like convicted to death for those people.
Learn more about the law of suspects here:-
brainly.com/question/900659
#SPJ1
Answer:
c
Explanation:
He believed that it would save Japanese lives as well.
Answer:
commander in chief
Explanation:
Commander in chief is the role assigned to the US President in function. He then controls all branches of the US army (land, air, navy and now space).
chief executive is his role as leader as the White House, the executive branch of the government.
chief of party is is role within his political party, the Republicans for the current President.
chief legislator, as representing the executive branch, he's the one singing in to laws the bills adopted by the Congress.
Because the internment broke several conditions of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution (in the United States). The same thing happened in Canada. I've lived in 2 communities that interred the Japanese during WWII. I find they have varied in their response to what happened to them during the war, but for the most part, they are model citizens. They have been very forgiving of their treatment.
It is important for every citizen to remember to defend the Constitution. The rights of citizens cannot be taken away on a whim. Every safeguard must be fully exercised or the Constitution is just a piece of paper.
New Citizens should remember that rights are conditional. If treason is involved the Constitution will not provide adequate protection. If obedience is required, it should be given. That's the balance between the Bill of Rights and allegiance to another country. The internment should never have happened and wouldn't have in normal times.
