1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harman [31]
3 years ago
15

5.

History
1 answer:
pshichka [43]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Federal power........

You might be interested in
The process for amending Florida's and the U.S. Constitution are similar because both have
Molodets [167]

Answer:two main steps proposal and approval

Explanation: because im doing the test right know and i got it right

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Help ASAP
pantera1 [17]

The correct answer is:

It allowed and encouraged the recruitment of blacks to be soldiers for the U

forces.

Explanation:

It allowed forces to recruit the black males in the Union for the army in that there were many black leaders who were also in favor of this so that there was a possible emancipation of the black population.

They could fight for their own race's right to be free and this would have also given them good monetary recompenses.

This meant that fighting in the war would have given them a better lifestyle after the war and a better life to look forward to.

6 0
2 years ago
You really don't like political party's however you're known as a federalist and soon associated with that party. Chances are go
liq [111]
Federalist and soon associated with that party that he name is James Madison
so the right answer is D.

good luck
3 0
3 years ago
How was wilsons moral diplomacy different than the big stick policy
AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

The international countries involved behavior because they caused a disparity between the United States and China. That place with Latin America was the main contrast between Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy and Teddy Roosevelt's "big stick" diplomacy.

Explanation:

Hope this help happy holidays! :D

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which man was a Union general known for attacking his opponent’s resources?
    12·2 answers
  • what word is the ability helped Farmers to plant and grow crops successfully in different regions of the colonial America's
    12·2 answers
  • Match the vocabulary word with its meaning.
    6·2 answers
  • Explain ONE way that Imagine 2 illustrates the spread of scientific knowledge in the period before 1450
    14·1 answer
  • In Texas history, an empresario could BEST be described as A) a settler who agreed to come Texas in and settle rural areas. B) a
    13·2 answers
  • The Constitution gives the legislative branch the power to (1 point)
    5·2 answers
  • What event gave the Europeans (not Spaniards) their chance to colonize North Arrerica?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the Varna System(Caste System) helped in spread buddhism in India?
    15·2 answers
  • 1) Close Reading: What does section 1 of the Monroe Doctrine say about future European
    7·1 answer
  • What does not describe Aztec religious beliefs
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!