Answer:
- Ben has not committed an assault or a battery because he acted in self defense.
Explanation:
As per the question, the statement that illustrates a true claim regarding the given situation is that Ben has neither committed an assault or battery as whatever he did(shoving Mike) was just an action in self-defense to protect himself from Mike's blow. It was Mike who attempts to strike Ben at first while the latter was just attempting to safeguard himself from his blow. Therefore, Ben's actions could not be considered either an offense/assault or battery as he acted in Self-defense and not intentionally.
The correct answer is B) Teachers are the best judges of how much homework is necessary.
Explanation:
The purpose of a counterclaim is to present an opposite position about a specific situation or issue. In the case presented, the claim focuses on stating homework should be regulated by law. On the other hand, the first counterclaim states homework should be established by students. This means the main focus of the claim and counterclaim is who or what assigns and regulates homework.
According to this, the best option for a counterclaim is "Teachers are the best judges of how much homework is necessary" because this presents an opposite position about who should assign homework as in this case, it purposes teachers should do it rather than the law.
B) It is more suspenseful because it shows what the accused is thinking.
It depends on which word is underlined.
If the underlined word is <em>boat, </em>then it is used as A. predicate nominative in this sentence.
A predicate nominative is a noun following a copulative/linking verb.
The linking verb in this sentence is <em>is, </em>and the noun following it is <em>boat. </em>
Answer:
Can you clarify which story please and thank you
Explanation: