Answer:
For the first one it is D.
Step-by-step explanation:
I added 84.6 and 30.4 which gives me 115. I then added 66 to get 181, triangles angles only add up to 180 degrees, therefore they are not similar.
The brainliest please ................,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
MArishka [77]
Answer:
d
Step-by-step explanation:
There are several ways you can solve this problem if you're trying to solve for m and n. You can substitute, or systems of equations. However, I'm going to use substitution:
2m + n = 0 => n = -2m
We can input that in for the other equation:
m + 2n = 3 now becomes: m + 2(-2m) = 3
Now we can solve:
m + 2(−2m) = 3
m + −4m = 3
(m + −4m) = 3 (Combine Like Terms)
−3m=3
m = -1
Now we can input that value in to solve for n:
We said that n = -2m, and m = -1, so n = -2(-1):Answer:
n = 2
Your final answer is m = -1, and n = 2, which can also be written as (m,n) = (-1,2)
----------------------
However, if you were solving for m+n:
You would add the two equations!:
2m + n = 0
m + 2n = 3
----------
3m + 3n = 3
Now, you can take 3 common:
3(m+n) = 3
m + n = 1
Your final answer for what m + n equals 1!
Answer:
13.76
Step-by-step explanation:
Area of the whole
The area of the whole = s^2 (the firgure is a square
s = 8
Area of the whole = 8^2 = 64
Area of the unshaded part
The 2 half circles = 1 whole circle
The radius of the 1/2 circle = 4 (eight has been cut in half)
Area of two half circles = 2* (pi r^2/2)
Area of two half circles = 2 * (pi 4^2/2)
area of two half circles = 16*pi
Area of the shaded area
Area of the shaded area = area of the whole - area of the unshaded area
Area of the shaded area = 64 - 16*pi
Area of the shaded area = 64 - 3.14*16 = 13.76
Answer:
(D) Conclusions drawn using deductive reasoning are always valid, while conclusions drawn using inductive reasoning may or may not be valid.
Step-by-step explanation:
