Answer:
d. Whether the statute has a secular legislative purpose and whether the statute's principal or primary effect either advances or inhibits religion; and also whether the statute fosters an excessive government entanglement with religion
Explanation:
The establishment clause is related to the first amendment of the US constitution. This clause refers to the freedom of religion that should be allowed in the country, as it states that the government is prohibited from establishing and imposing a single religion on all citizens of the country, as well as preventing citizens from following the religion they desire. .
Accordingly, whether the statute has a secular legislative objective and whether the primary or primary effect of the statute promotes or inhibits religion; and also if the statute promotes excessive government involvement with religion means that the government statute is violating the Establishment Clause.
Answer:
There are stark differences between public and private prisons. When it comes to overall comparisons, privately run prisons are often less likely to report data on inmate population, staffing, or where the budget was spent. The main difference between the two types of prisons comes down to money.
Each for-profit facility or institution houses people who violated the law. They are run by private, third-party companies rather than the state government, who runs traditional public prison. Private prisons receive their funding from government contracts and many of these contracts are based on the total number of inmates and their average length of time served
Explanation:
Answer:
wheres the answer choices?
Explanation:
The United States Congress divided into two houses as all states have equal representation in one house to benefit smaller states, and representation is based on population in the other house to satisfy larger states.
Answer: Option C
Explanation:
The framers of U.S. Constitution have essentially organized the Congress into two establishments namely:
- the Senate, and
- the House of Representative.
The Connecticut Compromise proposed the division of Congress. It was proposed in the Constitutional Convention in 1787 by the Connecticut delegates, Oliver Ellsworth and Roger Sherman.
This object behind this proposal was to maintain the balance of interest of both the large as well as small states as the Constitution has bestowed equal voice to each State in the Senate whereas the criteria for representation in the House of Representative is the size of population of each State.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
'di ko sure HAHAHAHA pero sana tama