A group of reviewers with your highest ratings
Answer:
b. Customized auditing.
Explanation:
Vulnerability scanning is a process of finding or testing a system for weak or vulnerable spots which can be exploited by outsiders. It helps to boost the computer network in an organisation.
There are two types of vulnerability scanning, they are credentialed and non-credentialed scanning and they are defined as implied. The non credentialed scan requires no authorisation and credentials for scanning to take place while credentialed scan is the reverse.
The credentialed scanning provides baseline and customised auditing features.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Yes, the given statement is true that a DFA is equivalent to NFA in terms of power. For any type of NFA we can easily build an equal DFA so, the NFA are not much powerful as compared to DFA. Both NFA and DFA are characterized by a similar type of class.
DFA is a special case of NFA and They both defined in the same class of language. Each condition in the DFA get summarized by all the condition that the NFA has itself.
Alternative 1:A small D-cache with a hit rate of 94% and a hit access time of 1 cycle (assume that no additional cycles on top of the baseline CPI are added to the execution on a cache hit in this case).Alternative 2: A larger D-cache with a hit rate of 98% and the hit access time of 2 cycles (assume that every memory instruction that hits into the cache adds one additional cycle on top of the baseline CPI). a)[10%] Estimate the CPI metric for both of these designs and determine which of these two designsprovides better performance. Explain your answers!CPI = # Cycles / # InsnLet X = # InsnCPI = # Cycles / XAlternative 1:# Cycles = 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.94*2 + 0.06*150)CPI= 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.94*2 + 0.06*150) / X1= X(0.50*2 + 0.50(0.94*2 + 0.06*150) ) / X= 0.50*2 + 0.50(0.94*2 + 0.06*150)= 6.44Alternative 2:# Cycles = 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150)CPI= 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150) / X2= X(0.50*2 + 0.50(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150)) / X= 0.50*2 + 0.50(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150)= 3.97Alternative 2 has a lower CPI, therefore Alternative 2 provides better performance.
