Dividing <em>f(x)</em> by 2<em>x</em> + 5 leaves the same remainder as division by <em>x</em> + 5/2. By the remainder theorem, it is equal to <em>f </em>(-5/2), so the remainder here is
<em>f</em> (-5/2) = 8 (-5/2)³ + 4 (-5/2)² - 13 (-5/2) + 3 = -129/2
For this case we have to:
x: Let the variable representing the unknown number
We algebraically rewrite the given expression:
Twice a number plus 10, is represented as:
Three times that number less 4. is represented as:

Thus, the complete expression is:

Subtracting 3x from both sides of the inequality:

Subtracting 10 from both sides of the inequality:

Equal signs are added and the same sign is placed:

We multiply by -1 on both sides, taking into account that the sense of inequality changes:

The solution is given by all values of "x" less than 14.
Answer:

Do you have a picture or sum?
Well, anything that's rotated (turned), reflected (flipped), or translated (moved) is still the same shape of the same size, so the new figures would be congruent with the originals. Dilation, however, is when the shape stays the same but the size changes, so when a figure is dilated, it's not congruent, just similar. 2 out of the 4 are dilated, so those ones would be the answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
1.77 would be closer to 2