Answer: What inference can you draw from why the First Continental Congress cut off trade with Britain and Ireland? Colonial leaders thought a boycott against British trade would be effective. The colonists had realized that they might have to fight British soldiers.
Explanation: Hope it helps :)
The ottoman, safavid, and mughal empires rose as a result of the invention of gun powder by the Chinese.
<h3 />
<h3>The Ottoman Empire</h3>
The Ottoman Empire was an empire that controlled a large percentage of Southeastern Europe, Western Asia, and Northern Africa. The reign of the Ottoman empire started in the 14th and ended in the early 20th centuries.
It was founded in northwestern Anatolia in the town of Söğüt by the Turkoman tribal leader Osman I.
<h3>Safavid Empire</h3>
The Safavid dynasty was one of the largest dynasties to emerge in Iran from 1501 to 1736. it originated from the Safavid order of Sufism, which was established in the city of Ardabil in the Iranian Azerbaijan region.
<h3>Mughal Empire</h3>
The Mughal Empire which was founded in the year 1526, also referred to as the Mogul or Moghul Empire, was an early modern empire in South Asia.
Learn more about the ottoman empire at brainly.com/question/711874
Learn more about the Safavid empire at brainly.com/question/11049223
Learn more about the mughal empire at brainly.com/question/1594484
More powerful air force radar and message decoding technologies.
The Germans made efforts to bomb Royal Air Force airfields and take out Britain's radar defense system, but the outnumbered RAF fighters managed to outmaneuver their opponents, aided by radar technology.
As for message decoding technologies, the code-cracking machine developed by Alan Turing had an impact particularly on naval battles in the Atlantic between the Germans and the Allies. Once they developed the ability to decode German messages, the British had to proceed carefully and not act on every military message or the Germans would have suspected their encoded messages were being hacked.
The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.
yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.
No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.
hope it helps!
