Answer:
I argee
Explanation:
The mistake which was made on the previous generations can be avoid in the next generation
Sorry if I get it wrong but I think I might have your answers:
I. I’ll give the a wind, this means I will give you a hint, wind is no longer commonly used
II. And the very ports they blow, all the quarters that they no i’th shipment card. This is language that is not commonly used
III. I’ll dry him as hay this it’s figuratively speaking that the person would be so Drained until they could go on no more
IV. Sleeps on either night nor day, means not to sleep ever.
V. Where has thou been, sister, possibly means where have you been
VI. Sister where are thou this should mean where is her sister
VII. Killing swine meaning is a person compared to a pig because he kills
VIII. I’m like all right without a tail, I’ll do, I’ll do, and I’ll do, this is a figurative speech and comparing a rat without a tail the keep going and going and going with stopping at nothing
IX. A sailor‘s wife has Chestnut in her lap, and munched, and munch, and lunch, means she had chestnuts and continues to eat them until they were gone or she was just waiting for something
X. Give me GUOTH I: around thee witch the rump ronyon cries this language is not commonly used while talking to the witch
XI. But In a sieve, ill thither sail. This could mean that in a moment I shall continue to sail
XII. Her husbands Alppeo gone, master o’ the tiger, her husband died
DUDE I HOPE I EVEN ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION IF NOT THEN IM SORRRYYY
Answer:
you can expect <u>no</u> protest from the unhappy people
Im not sure best guess is B
Answer:
There was no record seen by Wilmot, to show that Shakespeare read a book, let alone write a letter.
Explanation:
James Wilmot, a reverend and literary scholar came up with an idea in 1781 that Shakespeare was not Shakespeare. He went to the house that William Shakespeare lived during his lifetime, and went through all the libraries in his Stratford residence and searched for correspondence.
There was no record seen by Wilmot, to show that Shakespeare read a book, let alone write a letter. He did not find Shakespeare signatures on the bottom of the old letters that were seen. He also stated that there was no property, belonging to Shakespeare, that was written on the on the endpapers of a Bible.
James Wilmot concluded that the plays of Shakespeare could not have been written by someone who did not leave an literary paper trail behind him.
