The amendment was proposed by the Congress on December 9, 1803, and was ratified by the requisite three-fourths of state legislatures on June 15, 1804.
The Sparta laid the foundation of military standards because they were one of the smartest war civilizations and came up with the idea of strategies and new war advancements that the military now use, strategies and advances in weapons'.
Hope this helps
Mental illness has always been subject to stigma and discrimination. There are a number of studies on public attitudes towards people with mental illness. Long-term studies, however, examining changes over time are scarce.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine potential changes concerning attitudes between 1976 and 2014 in Vilhelmina, a community in northern Sweden.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent out to a random sample of 500 adults aged 18-70 years. The same questionnaire has previously been used in 1976 and 2003.
RESULTS: The attitudes towards people with mental illness have not generally become more positive over the years. In 2014 almost a quarter of the population still think that "people with mental illness commit violentX acts more than others". Even more people in 2014 than in 1976 agree to the statement that "mental illness harms the reputation more than a physical disease" (77.2% versus 52.8%). People with low educational level have more negative views than people with higher education. Younger respondents, < 20 years, had a more positive view than the older age groups. Almost 70% of the respondents would advise someone with psychological problems to seek a psychiatrist but only 23% of the respondents would follow their own advice. Psychotherapy has been and is still highly appreciated. As regards medication the perception is more critical, but there has been a significant change, however, to a more positive attitude towards medication since 1976.
CONCLUSION: Attitudes towards mental illness and mentally ill people have not changed substantially over time.
Answer:
The question is incomplete and the full version can be found online.
Both accounts are written using a chronological text structure, meaning that they use to relate the events in the order they happened.
This structure grants credibility to the individual accounts of the two witnesses, as they are describing what they saw as evidence of what happened during the Boston Tea Party protest on December 16, 1773, at Griffin's Wharf in Boston, Massachusetts.
Explanation:
In Joshua Wyeth´s account we can see that the text has a chronological structure because it uses phrases such as "We first talked to," "We finally concluded," and "At the appointed time, we met" to order the sequence of events.
In John Andrews´account, he uses the same kind of time phrases: "They then proceeded," and "Before nine o´clock"
