1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady_Fox [76]
3 years ago
13

If I wanted to sue someone in civil court for $7,000 for damaging my property,

History
1 answer:
AleksAgata [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: I’m not really sure but I’ve did some research and it shows that property disputes are the most common court case. I’ve read something that states, “ Property law involves disputes about property ownership and damages to one person’s property or real estate. There are many different types of property disputes that a civil litigation attorney may handle. One common one is property line disputes, in which one party alleges that a neighbor crossed the property line boundary between their two homes for building or planting.” I’ve added some pictures that can hopefully help.

I really hope this helped and if it didn’t I’m very sorry.

You might be interested in
Cats or dogs? Preference.
djyliett [7]

Answer:

Dogs

Explanation:

I just think they’re better because they’re less work ‍♀️

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
General Lee’s surrender in 1865 marked the North’s defeat in the Civil War. the official end of slavery in the United States. th
daser333 [38]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Countries influenced by the marshall plan
timama [110]
Is there a multiple choice ?
6 0
3 years ago
Which Native American groups attempted to resist the Indian Removal Act? (Select all that apply.)
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

The policy of the 'Indian Removal Act' had controversy in its application after agreement. This is because the issue is deemed an issue for the U.S. indigenous people. Many Indian tribes do not support this policy and try to counter and Cherokee one of them.

Explanation:

• Indian Removal Act

The' Indian Removal Act ' policy is one of U.S. President Andrew Jackson's racial policies. On May 28, 1830, this policy was signed. Five of the most important tribes are threatened as an outcome of this policy. Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole are among these. This policy called for debate and was regarded in the United States to demean the Indians. Including Cherokee Indians who believe this policy to be unfair. Recalling that the Cherokee Indians played a quite wide part in the war against the British occupation in 1812.

• Cherokee in the United States

Cherokee is not an Indian tribe that could be underestimated. Cherokee gave the role of their land to the United States Government during the United States Revolution. With this land grant, the government promised Cherokee protection. The Cherokee Indians, however, were pushed out by the' Indian Removal Act' policy.

The policy harmed the Cherokee Indians by the U.S government to be moved to the Oklahoma area. The Cherokee Indians, however, remained resistant and opposed the policy. They attempted to reject the policy on the pretext of protecting their homeland from the oppressed white community. The Cherokee Indians endured a tragic destiny despite the battle and this tragedy became known as ' The Trail of Tears ' that claimed the lives of as many as 4,000 Cherokee people.

Learn More

If you’re interested learning more about this topic, we recomended you also take a look at the following question:

• How did the New England, Mid-Atlantic, Chesapeake, and Southern colonies develop differently? brainly.com/question/13165633

• Which of these was not a key difference between Northern and Southern states at the Constitutional Convention? brainly.com/question/13165577

Keyword: Indian Removal Act, Cherokee, US Government, American History

Subject: History

Class: 10-12

Sub-chapter:  American History

8 0
3 years ago
Which were key arguments for and against government suppression of dissent during world war i?
s344n2d4d5 [400]
For the government: Dissent is unpatriotic and dangerous and must be suppressed. Against the government: Dissent is part of free speech and is healthy in a democracy.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these factors contributed to the rise of absolutism in France?
    14·2 answers
  • WHo was the 2nd president of the us
    12·2 answers
  • After world war 1, the japanese military
    11·1 answer
  • The most important component of the ideology of the republican party at its founding was
    8·1 answer
  • How did the people of Yoruba pick their leaders?
    9·1 answer
  • Which group was not a part of the<br><br> d.c. hardcore scene?
    15·1 answer
  • Look at the following map. In which region was Israel established as a national home for Jewish people following World War II?
    6·1 answer
  • Can you plz help me 20 points
    8·1 answer
  • Anybody good with political cartoon in history and wanna help me? Free Brainliest and points!
    7·1 answer
  • What is pollination??? anyone here let's ch.at na yrr​
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!