During the 17th century, the Scientific Revolution reached vastly new horizons that greatly furthered our <u>understanding of the physical world</u>. Science advances when the processes through which we discern knowledge become more accurate and reliable, and it always has to start with basic assumptions.
<u>Copernicus'</u> commitment to his radical logical assumptions, went so far as to causing a complete change of paradigm that shifted how the entire world was seen, both cosmically and religiously. We can say for sure that with his theory of heliocentrism, he initiated the Scientific Revolution all by himself.
<u>Kepler's</u> strongest input came with the three Laws of Planetary Motion, discovering that the planets move around the Sun in orbits shaped like ellipses.
Newton presented the three principal Laws of Motion, which served as the basis for all of modern physics. In addition, his introduction and development of calculus became the most relevant method of solving more complex mathematical problems. He also introduced the Law of Universal Gravitation.
Hope this helps!
Answer :in the decades following the Civil War, the United States emerged as an industrial giant. Old industries expanded and many new ones, including petroleum refining, steel manufacturing, and electrical power, emerged. Railroads expanded significantly, bringing even remote parts of the country into a national market economy.
Industrial growth transformed American society. It produced a new class of wealthy industrialists and a prosperous middle class. It also produced a vastly expanded blue collar working class. The labor force that made industrialization possible was made up of millions of newly arrived immigrants and even larger numbers of migrants from rural areas. American society became more diverse than ever before.
The opium wars ended with China losing money and a colony.
Answer:
selling products for cash
<span>Machiavelli was an Italian Renaissance Philosopher and statesman, through his works he often argued that political life could perhaps be excused for performing violent and deceptive actions which would not be a right in private life. He described how neither moral or religious rules alone were sufficient in governing. Because of this Machiavelli was often criticized and misunderstood by critics of the time because of this view he had on the relationship between politics and ethics. He was regarded as opportunistic and manipulative for this reason.</span>
