The difference between Tucker and Karly's take is that Tucker's solution is analytical while Karly's is graphical. But both are correct either way.
For Tucker's solution, let's say at x=-3 the value for y is 4, and at x=3, the value of y is still 4, then the average rate of change or slope is 0. Note that the slope of the curve is Δy/Δx. Since there is no change for Δy, the slope is zero.
For Karly's solution, even if the curve travels high or low but would have the same elevation of x=-3 and x=3, the average rate of change is still zero. It is actually just same with Tucker's but Karly just verbalizes her solution that was observed visually.
Answer:
The selected answer seem correct...
schools have more than 5 students,
fourth of July is always a 4,
doors can not be 0 feet high
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
B -1/5
you have to follow pemdas first get rid of the parethase which leaves you with 2+3x+6x=-4x+8x+1 then you add what you can do then you get 2+9x=4x+1 then you subtract 2 from both sides and subtract 4x from both sides which leaves you with 5x=-1 then you divide 5 from both sides and get x=-1/5
Answer:
3.5%
Step-by-step explanation:
4000*3.5% =1400
4000-1400=2600 percentage rosie loss 3.5%
