Answer:
In 1753, Lieutenant Governor Dinwiddie of Virginia ordered a young, ambitious 21-year old George Washington on a mission deep into the Ohio Country to confront the French. Washington’s account of his journey to Fort Le Beouf and back made Major Washington a celebrity on both sides of the Atlantic. In 1754 Washington’s surprise attack upon a small French force at Jumonville Glen. His subsequent surrender to French forces at the Battle of Fort Necessity helped to spark the French and Indian War, which was part of the imperial conflict between Great Britain and France known as the Seven Years’ War. The following year, Washington accompanied Major General Edward Braddock on his ill-fated march on Fort Duquesne.
There you go Mate have a good rest of the day
Answer:
Political and social leaders should prioritize effectiveness over virtue. This is so because virtue, although in the vast majority of cases is correct and in accordance with the moral and ethical standards of a society, does not always obtain tangible positive results for citizens or members of a certain group.
Effectiveness, on the other hand, although it is more lax in terms of ethical and moral standards (often disregarding certain values in order to obtain positive results), it obtains better results that positively affect people's lives.
I think that it could be the last one
Answer: Brutal military organization, fear of authority, and lack of empathy.
Explanation:
That statement speaks of a fierce military structure in the German army. Such a statement is not isolated; it is a common phrase used by a war criminal. It is, in fact, an individual dismissal of responsibility for a crime that is not justified because these people could have refused to execute the order.
On the other hand, there was a fear of certain sanctions if individual orders were not killed, but this could not and should not be used as an excuse at any time. Such statements indicate that these individuals are, in fact, people without attitude, people who lack empathy, or are influenced by completeness, so they believe that evil is right. It is essential to refute such statements also for the sake of the higher good since humanity touched the civilization floor during the Second World War.
To make a positive factual statement about your civilization on the basis of comparison with some other civilization, it is necessary to carry out in-depth research from reliable sources on the main aspects of a society.
<h3 /><h3>Positive factual statement</h3>
It corresponds to an empirical statement, where there is no value judgment, that is, it does not come from an opinion that indicates approval or disapproval on a topic.
This resource is used to explain theories and concepts, and should be prioritized when writing an academic essay, where facts must be used to support the argument and generate greater reliability about the text.
Therefore, to write a positive statement about your civilization compared to an ancient civilization for example, it is essential to use book, indexes, documents and reliable sources to support your argument.
Find out more information about positive statement here:
brainly.com/question/4891924
