T-bills are offered in what monetary increment? $1 $10 $100 $1000

You are analyzing Jillian’s Jewelry (JJ) stock for a possible purchase. JJ just paid a dividend of $1.50 yesterday. You expect t

disa [49]

Answer:

A. D1 = 1.50*1.06 = 1.59

D2 = 1.59*1.06 = 1.69

D3 = 1.69*1.06 = 1.79

B. PV of D1=(1.50*1.06)/1.13^1=1.41

PV of D2=(1.50*1.06^2)/1.13^2=1.32

PV of D3=(1.50*1.06^3)/1.13^3=1.24

PV of all dividend = (1.50*1.06)/1.13^1 + (1.5*1.06^2)/1.13^2 + (1.5*1.06^3)/1.13^3

PV of all dividend = 1.59/1.13 + 1.6854/1.2769 + 1.786524/1.442897

PV of all dividend = 1.407079646 + 1.319915 + 1.238150748

PV of all dividend = 3.965145814288893

PV of all dividend = 3.97

C. PV = 27.05/(1+13%)^3

PV = 27.05/(1.13)^3

PV = 27.05/1.442897

PV = 18.74701

PV = 18.75

D. The most you should pay for it :

= (1.50*1.06)/1.13^1+(1.5*1.06^2)/1.13^2+(1.5*1.06^3)/1.13^3+27.05/1.13^3

=22.71

E. Value = (1.50*1.06)/(13%-6%)

Value = 1.59 / 7%

Value = 1.59 / 0.07

Value = 22.714286

Value =22.71

F. No, the value is not dependent on the holding period, you can see from above that the value of infinite time period estimated in E equals to the value calculated when there was 3 years holding period.

5 0

3 years ago

If a country imposes a tariff on imported shoes, we expect the domestic price of shoes to ______ .

boyakko [2]

If a country imposes a tariff on imported shoes, we expect the domestic price of shoes to rise, domestic consumption to fall, and domestic production to rise.

A levy on imported goods is known as a tariff. The use of an example is the simplest way to explain how it operates. The US lumber industry is the example we've used throughout this section, and it's continuing below. The domestic equilibrium price and quantity in the domestic market are $1,000 per board foot and 40 million board feet, respectively. PD = $1,000 and QD = 40,000,000 are used to represent this. The world price, or PW, in this instance is significantly less than the local price. While this is not always the case, if PW is higher than PD, there is no reason to import (This model assumes that imports are identical to domestic products in every respect except for price).

American customers will buy a lot more lumber if they can obtain imports for as little as $400. The number of units they will be demanded will rise to 70 million (40 million more than the domestic equilibrium). With the improved accessibility to inexpensive lumber, these consumers are vastly better off.

The imports, on the other hand, cause domestic producers to lose a significant amount of surplus. Previously, they could have provided 40 million board feet of lumber for $1,000, but now they can only provide 10 million. This is due to the fact that many domestic companies will either exit the market or reduce production since they can no longer compete with the foreign production.

60 million board feet of lumber are imported from Canada out of a total production of 70 million board feet, 10 million of which are produced domestically.

To lean more about Tariffs from the given link.

brainly.com/question/26923792

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago

The December 31, 2021, adjusted trial balance for Fightin' Blue Hens Corporation is presented below. Accounts Debit Credit Cash

zheka24 [161]

Answer:

Usually, we use the "Income Summary" account to close the Income Statement accounts such as revenues and expenses.

First, close the revenue account by debiting it:

(DR) Service Revenue $450,000

(CR) Income Summary $450,000

Then, close the expenses accounts by crediting them:

(DR) Income Summary $407,000

(CR) Salaries Expense $350,000

(CR) Rent Expense $17,500

(CR) Depreciation Expense $35,000

(CR) Interest Expense $4,500

Finally, close the Income Summary account to Retained Earnings.

The balance of the Income Summary is a credit balance of $43,000

(credit of $450,000 less debit of $407,000)

So, to close the account we have to debit it.

(DR) Income Summary $43,000

(CR) Retained Earnings $43,000

4 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is not correct? Select one: a. Taxes levied on sellers and taxes levied on buyers are not equivalent. b.

liq [111]

Answer:

The correct answer is option a.

Explanation:

Taxes levied on either buyers or sellers are equivalent. In both cases, the tax creates a wedge. This wedge is the difference between the price that the buyers have to pay and the price that the sellers receive.

The price that the buyers have to pay increases while the price that the sellers receive decreases. But this tax wedge does not depend on whom the tax is levied, it depends on the elasticity of demand and supply. So whether the tax is levied on buyers or sellers, the tax wedge will remain the same.

The tax burden will be shared between both buyers and sellers. So it is incorrect to say that the taxes levied on sellers and taxes levied on buyers are not equivalent.

8 0

3 years ago

The past five monthly returns for Kohl’s are 3.54 percent, 3.62 percent, −1.68 percent, 9.25 percent, and −2.56 percent. Compute

luda_lava [24]

Answer

The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.

Explanation

You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.

6 0

3 years ago