They believed that these institutions only serve the
interests of the wealthy. The movement
was born out of the frustrations of the farmers who wanted reforms and their
interests promoted. They believed that
by forming this party that they could achieve those goals.
Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
Most people in Central Africa are commercial farmers.
One example is that on the cartridges in the gun that had to be pulled out with their teeth, were greased with pork or beef fat, which was against their religion.
a second is that they didn't respect many of the traditions.
