1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Veronika [31]
3 years ago
5

Name the two Spanish monarchs who married and unified Spain in 1469?

History
1 answer:
Ivanshal [37]3 years ago
4 0
I agree! Shahhshshshshshshsha
You might be interested in
What can I learn about E-trade?
trapecia [35]
The all. Jenelle d d r fjdjd. Fidjdnd djdndhd didn’t didhdnddhdud didn’t dhdnd ddudndnrrinr d fndnd. R
6 0
3 years ago
hi i’m doing a history project on the mayan people. I need 3 key figures (people) for my project i’m not super familiar with the
iren [92.7K]

Tikal, Uaxactún, and Copán,

3 0
3 years ago
Companies of soldiers, new recruits, were trained to stand and fight in rank and file. They stood shoulder to shoulder in straig
Iteru [2.4K]
True ? True true true
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Culturally distinct groups resist being added to a state or tries to break away is an example of what type of nationalist moveme
MrMuchimi

Separation is the type of nationalist movements

Explanation:

Let's start with the explanation of the basic belief of nationalism which is nothing but people who belong to a single nationality or ancestry should come and live under the same government. There are three types of the nationalist movement and they are unification, separation and state-building. As the word unification defines it is nothing but merging the politically divided land but they are culturally same. Separation is defined as culturally distinct groups resist to be a part of a state. State-building is a culturally distinct group forming into a state.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision for Dred Scott v. Sanford?
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

It ruled against Dred Scott and set aside the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty.

Explanation:

The case Dred Scott v. Sanford argued whether a slave can obtain his freedom when he step on a state that make slavery illegal.

It happened in 1857. At that time, Dred Scott's (A slave) was taken by his owner from Missouri to Illinois. (According to Missouri compromise,  It is still legal to own slaves in Missouri but It is Illegal to do so in Illinois).

Scott tried to make his case to the court stating that as soon as he entered Illinois, his status as a slave should be voided and he should be considered as a citizen.

At that time, The Missouri supreme court ruled against Scott's plead. The court stated that he could never be a citizen since citizenship only apply to white people. So he's still a slave no matter where his slave owner took him.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which two ways did the spread of Enlightenment thought contribute to the French Revolution?
    13·2 answers
  • Which event angered Americans and compelled the US government to send two strongly worded warnings to Germany in May and June 19
    11·1 answer
  • The mound builders were American Indians who flourished
    15·2 answers
  • Which country opposed capitalism in World War II
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT a key part of Burgoyne's plan to defeat the Americans during the Revolution:
    9·1 answer
  • tell whether each of the following is a rational or irrational if it is rational give the principal root.​
    11·1 answer
  • Leonidas was the king of
    8·2 answers
  • During World War I, the Russian army was small and ill prepared to fight. small but well prepared to fight. large but ill prepar
    8·2 answers
  • Who are people that risk capital in order to organize and run a business?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an economic change Americans faced after WW1?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!