This answer depends on you mostly. You just need to describe your dream and how you will accomplish it with the SMART acronym, which stands for:
-Specific
-Measurable
-Achievable
-Realistic
-Timely
Explanation:
In the poem , the poet uses the word ‘dance’ quite a few times .
In the 2nd stanza , Wordsworth had used the word ‘dance’ to show that the daffodils were moving to and fro due to the breeze . It seemed like the flowers were dancing joyously , as if in rapture , in the gentle breeze . The movement of the daffodils had been described as ‘ tossing their heads in a sprightly dance ’ .
In the 4th stanza , poet William uses the word ‘dance’ to show that his pleasure-filled heart started to dance when introduced to the memory of those 10,000 daffodils along the margin of the bay . The daffodils come back to the speaker's imaginative memory — access to which is a gift of solitude — and fills him with joy as his mind dances with the daffodils .
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
Verisimilitude is the fact that some things are more true than others, and the fact that Jason, the narrator, closes his eyes and starts imagining Jefferson, shows that his minds image may not be completely truthful, establishing verisimilitude.
The inference that can be made about what young Dale Carnegie recognized in the Chautauqua speaker and the student speakers at his college is: C. He recognized that good public speakers appeared to be powerful and successful individuals.
<h3>What is inference?</h3>
Inference is known to be the conclusion that one reaches due to evidence provided or due to reasoning. Readers make inferences from what read after further reasoning or examining the available evidences.
We can see that the correct inference that can be made about what young Dale Carnegie recognized in the Chautauqua speaker and the student speakers at his college is that he recognized that good public speakers appeared to be powerful and successful individuals.
Learn more about inference on brainly.com/question/24442913
It may have been an unfair decision but sadly the judge had
to uphold the law and what sealed Absalom’s fate was the fact that he fired the
shot that killed the servant even if it was out of fear. At the very least, the other two should not
have absolved and instead should have also been given some kind of sentence
because all three of them entered the house and it was clear what their
intention was.
