The purpose of the New Jersey Plan, proposed in June 1787, was to support the interests of the smaller states in the nation, in opposition to Virginia's plan, which argued for a powerful national government. William Paterson, the representative of New Jersey, presented the plan during the Committee of the Whole debates, which ran from June 16 to 19.
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
Let us summarise in a few points the main differences between these two plans, which represent two opposing visions for the future of the United States.
- The New Jersey plan defends a decision made by the states, the plan of Virginia defends that is the whole people who should decide thanks to the election of representatives.
- The New Jersey plan wants the states to have all the same number of representatives in parliament, Virginia's plan is that larger states have more representatives than smaller ones.
- The New Jersey plan prefers an executive power shared by several persons, Virginia's plan, the executive power in the hands of a single president.
- The New Jersey plan wants state laws to pass the laws of the country, Virginia's plan that the laws of the country be superior to all others.
It is finally the plan of Virginia which is adopted with 7 votes against 3. So, the United States moves towards a centralized decision and powerful big states, with small states relegated to the background.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- How the US Congress works: brainly.com/question/3217978
- Facts about Virginia plan: brainly.com/question/2492
- The United States first governments: brainly.com/question/5148187
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9 - 12
Subject: History
Chapter: The Birth of an American Empire
Keywords: New Jersey plan, Committee of the whole, the US politic, the United States congress history, Virginia Plan
Answer:
The French were banned from using the Mississippi River.
Explanation:
North America gained this area.
Freed them from slavery, gave them civil rights, and made it fair in the political system.
Answer:
Capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor”
Explanation:
King understood well the connection between poverty and capitalism. The year before his death, on 31 August 1967, he delivered “The Three Evils of Society” speech at the first and only National Conference on New Politics in Chicago.
When we foolishly maximize the minimum and minimize the maximum we sign the warrant for our own day of doom.It is this moral lag in our thing-oriented society that blinds us to the human reality around us and encourages us in the greed and exploitation which creates the sector of poverty in the midst of wealth. Again we have deluded ourselves into believing the myth that Capitalism grew and prospered out of the protestant ethic of hard word and sacrifice. The fact is that Capitalism was build on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor—both black and white, both here and abroad. . .The way to end poverty is to end the exploitation of the poor.
That’s the kind of analysis that made King so controversial in mainstream circles in his later years, and that has remained buried for the past 50 years under the exclusive focus on dreams and mountaintops.
D maybe hopefully i got it right if not am sorry
