"Naze sūgaku o suru no wa naze muzukashī nodesu ka?"
"Ume ni kite, kore o suru koto ga dekimasu."
"Watashi wa gakkō ga totemo kiraidesu."
"Anata wa sore o mei dekimasu."
'Ma, anata wa nani o suiteimasu ka? Anata wa watashi no sōzōryoku noichibudesu.'
'Sore wa anata no sapōtā to hanasu koto ga dekimasu ka?'
"Pointo wa nandesuka?"
Akirameru na, anata wa kore o motte iru"
"ikani umaku iku no?"
'Sore wa fusui kōide wanai?'
"Ā, karera wa shiru hitsuyō wanai."
"Īe, watashi wa jibun jishin o rikai suru hisuyō wa arimasen."
"Yatta yo!" 'Anata ni itta."
Damare."
Answer:
Because the individual may have a different path than the many
Explanation:
By limiting to the "healthy standards of development" so to say, the love relationships will be heterosexual, intended for the biological reasons of bringing a child- this means other styles of life like being single, having a vote on chastity or being homosexual and having no offspring will not be included.
This why in many circumstances an individual path will go wide astray from the many, and perhaps will that person benefit the most, from it. <em>It may happen that is also a lifestyle that is not imposed socially.</em>
Another of the strong arguments against Erikson model is that persons will keep searching identity well beyond the adolescence, into adulthood.
Unethical Because it's not right
