Answer:had to exercise discretion in D.All of these are correct
Explanation:
What is meant by exercising discretion?
Exercising discretion means one doesn't make a haste decision but they first consider other factors before they act. Those factors need to be evaluated in terms of which matters the most.
A.He had to consider whether to shoot the suspect
- officers are not supposed to just shoot the suspect in haste without a reason to believe that the suspect poses a threat to them like when they pull a gun and shoot back.
B.He had to consider whether the shots fired were coming from the suspect
- If the suspect isn't the one shooting back it would not be called for to shoot he suspect but the person who is shooting.
C.He had to consider his safety and the safety for others
- firing shots may put people around in danger or in the line of fire where innocent people could die.
Katherine's opportunity cost of attending the lecture is: the transportation and time cost of getting to the lecture event itself plus the reduction in her physics exam grade by not studying tonight.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The opportunity cost is the "cost" lost by not enjoying the benefit associated with the chosen alternative choice. People usually make use of opportunities to make themselves better.
The opportunity cost can be explained as giving up of profit or value to achieve something else. Opportunity cost is the value of giving up the best thing whenever you make a decision. When Katherine decided to attend the lecture of her favorite author, she lost her time, transportation cost and even scored low grade in physics exam as didn’t study on exam night.
Answer:
The Ethiopian Diaspora is one of the largest of all African countries and is concentrated primarily in the United States and United Kingdom. ... Internal migration occurs in the form of rural-urban migration, rural-rural migration, and resettlement policies, which are all substantial in Ethiopia.
Answer:
it was bad
Explanation:
it was taking over their land, invading it.
According to Sporre, it was during the 18th century that a differentiation between fine art and applied art began to take shape.
This distinction can be traced back to philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau who argued that there is an inherent difference in talent between artists who paint landscapes versus those who create portraits or figure sketches.
<h3>When was the separation of the fine and applied arts encouraged?</h3>
In the 18th century, Sporre argues that the values of an era encouraged the division of fine and applied arts.
He states that during this time period, people were more interested in practical applications than artistically-oriented endeavors.
This was due to advances made in science and technology, which allowed for things like machines, weapons, transportation systems etc to be developed and manufactured.
As a result of this emphasis on practicality, art became less important as it did not immediately have utilitarian value.
Taking account of both aesthetic and functional aspects simultaneously became something considered innovative or even daring which set the scene for later developments within the fine arts such as symbolism and abstractionism.
To learn more about applied and fine arts, visit:
brainly.com/question/14339622
#SPJ4
