1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ostrovityanka [42]
2 years ago
5

What impact did the spoils system have on American government? The spoils system was debated long after Jackson’s presidency had

ended. The spoils system had little effect because Jackson did not implement it. The spoils system was eventually written into the US Constitution. The spoils system made it easier for future presidents to veto legislation.
History
2 answers:
Mrac [35]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a because it is

Explanation:

gtnhenbr [62]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

corruption

Explanation:

As a result, the spoils system allowed

those with political influence to ascend to

powerful positions within the government,

regardless of their level of experience

or skill, thus compounding both the

inefficiency of government as well as

enhancing the opportunities for corruption.

You might be interested in
Which statement best describes a result of the Missouri Compromise?
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

D. Limits were set about where slavery could spread in U.S.  territories

Explanation:

In return to the limits of where slavery can spread, the US upheld that they will remain strict in catching and returning slaves, much to the displeasure of abolitionists in the North.

~

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a well-organized essay that explains how the Americans won the Revolutionary War. Your essay should include at least four
mote1985 [20]

Answer:

1. When the American Revolution began, it looked like the colonies faced insurmountable odds. How did a ragtag band of volunteers without a proper source of funding for food and equipment manage to overcome the most powerful army and navy in the world?

How did each of the following contribute to the success of the American Revolution?

George Washington’s leadership abilities

Geography

Foreign assistance

Colonists’ spirit and attitude

George Washington helped us in many ways in the revolutionary war. Despite his losses he knew how to run the military. He was a really tough and brave man. Those two characteristics helped us in the military because you have to be brave and take risks t get rewards. Lastly toughness helped us out a lot. When our solders are sick or don't feel good they don't get to call in sick. They have to tough it out and if we were not tough enough then our soldiers would have gave up.

Geography helped Americans out a lot. One of the ways it helped us is by helping us know the terrain. Going to a unknown terrain and even unknown climate can be a easy way of death. Another way is by knowing a way to supply troops and how it was possible. We need geography for this because if we didn't use geography we wouldn't know where we were traveling. We also would not know how to supply our troops.

If we did not have foreign assistance then we would not have won the war. The french were pretty much the way we got our supplies. Also we would have been enormously out numbered in troops with out there assistance. Even though some assistance such as Spain's assistance was not much help to us at all.

Positive attitudes are needed in any war but it really helped us out in the revolutionary war. They believed that they were going to win and get their land. Then the french came along and grew our spirits. This also helped us because when the french came it it greatly lowered the British peoples spirit. What they thought was going to be easy instantly turned to a hard battle.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
How different is the practice of anthropology in the 19th century with the 21st century
nataly862011 [7]

The anthropology of religion is the comparative study of religions in their cultural, social, historical, and material contexts.



The English term religion has no exact equivalent in most other languages. For example, burial practices are more likely to be called customs and not sharply differentiated from other ways of doing things. Early Homo sapiens (for example, the Neanderthals at Krapina [now in Croatia]) began burying their dead at least 130,000 years ago. To what end? And how and why have such practices changed over time? What might they have in common with the multitude of burial customs—known to be associated with differing conceptions of death and life—among people in the world today; for example, what might embalming practices in ancient Egypt and 19th-century Bolivia have in common with each other and with 21st-century embalming practices in North America? How do these relate to secondary burials, involving the exhumation and reburial of the corpse or its bones, as in Madagascar and Siberia, or rituals of cremation, as in Japan, India, or France? Paradoxically, anthropologists’ documentation of the enormous diversity of human customs, past and present, puts into question the very existence of “religion” as a single coherent system of practices, values, or beliefs. Indeed, what constitutes “religion” may be hotly debated even among coreligionists. The study of religion in anthropology requires consideration of all these matters, including anthropologists’ own terms of analysis.



Scholars of religion throughout the world have long recognized what the American philosopher and psychologist William James (1902) called “the varieties of religious experience.” Since the mid-19th century, one of the first and most important contributions of anthropologists has been to extend the study of those varieties beyond the formal doctrines and liturgies of established religious institutions to include related customs, regardless of when, where, and by whom they are practiced and whether they are celebrated, suppressed, or taken for granted. The anthropology of religion is the study of, in the words of the English anthropologist Edward Evans-Pritchard (Theories of Primitive Religion [1965]), “how religious beliefs and practices affect in any society the minds, the feelings, the lives, and the interrelations of its members…religion is what religion does.” Although Edward Burnett Tylor’s classic Primitive Culture (1871) documented the wide-ranging doings of his fellow Europeans, most anthropologists in the 19th and early 20th centuries focused on so-called primitive peoples living outside Europe and North America, on the grounds that religion, increasingly defined by contrast to reason, was a historically primitive form of behaviour that was already giving way to science. Subsequent research has proved these assumptions to be wrong. As anthropology has grown to include the study of all humans on an equal footing and the field of anthropology is practiced throughout the world, anthropologists continue to confront their parochial biases.




Over the next century, as museums with anthropological collections continued to develop as research institutions, many of the anthropologists who worked there turned away from collection-based work. Archaeologists and physical anthropologists continued to use collections for study, but, until a late 20th-century revival of interest in the history of anthropology and museums and in studies of material culture and the anthropology of art, few cultural anthropologists worked actively with collections.

The last quarter of the 20th century witnessed great change in the practice of anthropology in museums. The civil rights and decolonization movements of the 1960s increased awareness of the politics of collecting and representation. Ethical issues that had been ignored in the past began to influence museum practices. By the turn of the 21st century, most anthropologists working in museums had understood the need to incorporate diverse points of view in exhibitions and collections care and to rely on the expertise of people from the cultures represented as well as museum professionals. At the same time, many new museums—such as the U’mista Cultural Centre (1980) in Alert Bay, British Columbia, Canada—were established within the communities that created the objects on display. Anthropologists in museums also were concerned with issues such as the ethics of collecting, access to collections and associated data, and ownership and repatriation.


I just got a whole story for you to get it xD (I made some mistakes i think ;-;)

Hope this helps! ~ Kana ^^


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did president clinton's first budget aim to reduce the deficit?
emmasim [6.3K]
<span>If the revenue is less than the expenditure, a budget is said to be in deficit.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Simon Bolivar dreamed of a United States of South America. Besides geography, which factor made that dream impossible?
prisoha [69]
Besides geography, the major issue that would have made this impossible is that each "country" or state in South America was dominated by a different ruler, many of whom had fought of the Spanish--meaning that they would have never united under one title. Their cultures were also wildly different. 
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How are the historical and core beliefs of judaism and christianity both similar and different?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the initial issue that created a division for the muslims
    8·1 answer
  • The ____ is the presiding officer of the Senate whenever the vice president is NOT present.
    8·2 answers
  • Of the European countries that settled America, which country was primarily interested in fur industry? *
    15·1 answer
  • What state official is responsible for dispersing educational funds to all state educational institutions​
    11·1 answer
  • When was the mappa mundi created
    11·1 answer
  • Which statements best explain how the transatlantic slave trade changed African culture? Select three options.
    14·1 answer
  • Gummie to all <br><br>________________​
    15·2 answers
  • Why was it more difficult for Chinese immigrants to enter the United States in the late 1800s than it was for European immigrant
    10·1 answer
  • Why dø historians use chronology as an organizing principle?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!