Answer:
I believe <u>safety</u> is not one of the inalienable rights listed in the Declaration of Independence.
Explanation:
<u>Pursuit of happiness, liberty, and life is the correct inalienable rights that are included in Declaration of Independence.</u>
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
I mean, The United States did it, and I’m assuming that is what the question is referring too.
America was thousands of miles from Britain, and had no power over what happened to them. They held no representatives in parliament, so they had no control over what happened to them. I think it is completely sensible for the colonies to be upset over that, enough so to throw a revolution.
Answer:
Disruptive
Explanation:
The statement is about <em>Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District</em> case (1968-69). Some students wore black armbands as a protest to Government's policy in Vietnam and as a result were suspended by school authorities. Three students sought nominal damages and an injunction against a regulation that the respondents had promulgated banning the wearing of armbands. The District Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the regulation was within the Board's power and observed that wearing these armbands would be disruptive.
It was "Italy" that contained the first company to sell stock, since there were merchants in Venice who were able to lend money and make great profits, which attracted investors.
A. true, because the disease killed some of them and slavery defiantly killed people through them trying to escape and the torture of there masters. Hope this helps!
