1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astra-53 [7]
3 years ago
12

What can we do to interrupt hate when we see it before it gets so powerful that it leads to widespread harm of a particular popu

lation?
History
1 answer:
katrin [286]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Hate is a worldwide problem, it is not isolated to a single geographic region. Because of this, it is nearly impossible to exterminate hate, but there are things that can be done to interrupt it. For starters, join forces with others and speak up. Many hate crimes (not all) occur because people allow them to happen by not standing up for the victims that are being targeted. Another thing that can be done is to teach love and acceptance. Humans are not born with hate in their hearts, they are taught to hate. Teaching love and acceptance to children would have a chain effect worldwide that will drastically reduce the number of hate crimes worldwide.

You might be interested in
Which Union general's task was to capture Atlanta, a major confederate railroad center?
kiruha [24]

The correct answer is William T. Sherman.

Sherman was responsible for marching troops through the heart of the traitorous Southern States and for capturing Atlanta.

Sherman's March to the Sea was brilliant in that he burned the South as he went while also dodging the Southern Army. He knew that his job was to destroy the Southern economy and was not concerned with fighting the traitorous rebel army.

3 0
4 years ago
PLEASE NEED HELP Great Britain and France avoided a take over by Fascists by: restricting free speech. turning to a single-party
netineya [11]

Answer:

Explanation:

Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britain’s policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. Most closely associated with British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, it is now widely discredited as a policy of weakness. Yet at the time, it was a popular and seemingly pragmatic policy.  Hitler’s expansionist aims became clear in 1936 when his forces entered the Rhineland. Two years later, in March 1938, he annexed Austria. At the Munich Conference that September, Neville Chamberlain seemed to have averted war by agreeing that Germany could occupy the Sudetenland, the German-speaking part of Czechoslovakia - this became known as the Munich Agreement. In Britain, the Munich Agreement was greeted with jubilation. However, Winston Churchill, then estranged from government and one of the few to oppose appeasement of Hitler, described it as ‘an unmitigated disaster’.  Appeasement was popular for several reasons. Chamberlain - and the British people - were desperate to avoid the slaughter of another world war. Britain was overstretched policing its empire and could not afford major rearmament. Its main ally, France, was seriously weakened and, unlike in the First World War, Commonwealth support was not a certainty. Many Britons also sympathised with Germany, which they felt had been treated unfairly following its defeat in 1918.  But, despite his promise of ‘no more territorial demands in Europe’, Hitler was undeterred by appeasement. In March 1939, he violated the Munich Agreement by occupying the rest of Czechoslovakia. Six months later, in September 1939, Germany invaded Poland and Britain was at war.

8 0
3 years ago
How did this affect the way the church treated people of other religions at this time?
expeople1 [14]
What time period? maybe with a little more info I can help you
3 0
3 years ago
True or False: When a judge instructs the jurors to find a true bill of indictment against any and all persons whom the prosecut
ZanzabumX [31]
That would be true because thats just the normal process

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What words did the Pilgrims use to describe the
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

My Guess would be C.) Godly and Fair

Explanation:

Most of the pilgrims were of religious backgrounds and many traveled to america in search of religious freedom.

I may be wrong but I hope this helps though! :)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is campaign finance a concern in the united states?
    10·1 answer
  • In what way did some of the enlightenment thinkers differ in their views
    6·2 answers
  • During World War II, farmers were encouraged to grow large amounts of WHAT oil-producing crop to support the war effort?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following could be a plot's resolution?
    12·2 answers
  • The influential pamphlet, Common Sense, was authored by:
    5·2 answers
  • Tell me a good history joke and ill give you brainliest + 50 points
    9·2 answers
  • If nothing is faster than light how did the dark get there first???
    9·2 answers
  • Select all the correct answers.
    13·1 answer
  • Effects of ethnic conflicts to the development of africa​
    5·1 answer
  • REPORT ME PLEASE WILL MARK BRAINLIEST !!!!<br> + FR33 POINTS
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!