Answer: x - 4y = -16
Step-by-step explanation: Since we're given a point and a slope, we can write the equation of this line using the point-slope formula.
<h2>y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)</h2><h2 />
The given point, (4, 5), represents (x₁, y₁).
So if we plug all our given information into the formula,
including our slope of 1/4, we get y - 5 = 1/4(x - 4).
To put our equation in standard form, first, distribute
the 1/4 through the parentheses.
So we get y - 5 = 1/4x - 1.
Remember that standard form cannot have any fractions in it so our next step is to multiply both sides of the equation by 4 to get rid of the fraction.
That gives us 4y - 20 = x - 4.
Now moves the -20 to the right side by adding 20 to both sides.
So we get 4y = x + 16.
Now subtract x from both sides to get -x + 4y = 16.
Finally, our coefficient on our x term must be positive so we
divide both sides by -1 to get x - 4y = -16.
Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation:
12 goes into 180 fifteen times
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Graphing both inverses, they will be symmetrical about the line .
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Use:
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- C
- E
- B
Step-by-step explanation:
The idea of a "production possibilities curve" is that there is a fixed relationship between possible production of one product and possible production of another. This relationship is presumed to exist because resources used to produce one product are then unavailable to produce the other product.
The graph of the curve generally has increased production in the direction away from the origin. So, points between the curve and the origin represent production choices that do not utilize all available resources of the kind that give rise to the curve. That is, points "inside" the curve represent under-utilization of resources.
1. Point C represents under-utilization.
__
2. Points "outside" the curve are unattainable, because the curve represents production using all available resources.
Point E is unattainable.
__
3. The assumptions behind the curve are that there must be a tradeoff between production of one item and production of another that uses the same resources. That is, increasing production of one item will necessarily decrease production of the other, representing a cost of the increased production of the first item. We call this cost an "opportunity cost", because it represents production opportunity lost with respect to the second item.
Choice B describes this situation.
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
The very idea of a "production possibilities curve" represents the sort of simplification that is often used in the study of economics. The real world is much messier, and these curves are always dynamic. They are affected by the regulatory environment, resource quality, technology, product quality, and availability of alternate or competing products, among other things. The very existence of such a curve precludes the possibility of "win-win" situations, which we know are generally available if they are sought after.