Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Being the new Police Chief and also a servant of God I would first remind myself that I never want to force my beliefs, but I also. ... With that in mind I would begin discussing with the community leaders what their main ... However, in order to restore order in my community it would be essential to treat the problems that the ...
I think the answer would be E none of the above because all of them are types of dangers law enforcement may have to encounter
Birch Bayh Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse (Indianapolis)
Good question it is importantly because If no one knew then it would be chaos
