1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elden [556K]
3 years ago
9

Who has the primary role of collecting and preserving factual evidence from a crime scene

Law
1 answer:
Serga [27]3 years ago
6 0
D . Crime scene investigators
You might be interested in
العمومية والتجريد والإلزام من الصفات المشتركة بين القواعد القانونية
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

J2hwb3

Explanation:

Jdudnd hshssrhsuz

8 0
2 years ago
If arrested by private security, Miranda Rights are always provided.<br> False<br> True
fredd [130]

the answers is true true true true true

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When a witnesses statement is taken, what must the person taking it do?
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer: no it can’t be changed

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
STAY THE HARD R SEVEN TIMES
WARRIOR [948]

Answer:

THE HARD R THE HARD R THE HARD R THE HARD R THE HARD R THE HARD R THE HARD R

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS IF IT IS WHAT I REALLY THINK IT WAS I'LL DO THAT TOO

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is a federal law? Name 3 examples.
    8·1 answer
  • Would you consent to a search by police even if you believe that they had no evidence to indicate that you did anything wrong? W
    7·2 answers
  • Briefly define the term "assembly line justice" in your own words.
    14·1 answer
  • What are suspicionless searches? How does the need to ensure public safety justify certain suspicionless searches?
    13·1 answer
  • 15 A search warrant can force someone to have surgery to retrieve a bullet as long as probable cause exists. QA True B. False Re
    15·1 answer
  • A. what hazards might this motorcyclist encounter?
    11·1 answer
  • A professional who is present at the time of evidence gathering can be summoned to appear in court or to prepare a report on her
    14·1 answer
  • Television shows like Judge Judy and The People’s Court can offer a distorted view of the judicial process, but they do represen
    6·1 answer
  • Examples of agreements that violate government statutes and are unenforceable by the courts are contracts for the sale of alcoho
    11·2 answers
  • What does a motion for judgment on the pleadings request for the court to consider?.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!